Table 1.
Effects of training manipulations on PAC at stratum pyramidale: Summary of Genotype × Session ANCOVA results with speed as the covariate. Bold indicates significant effects.
| Manipulation | Comparison Session.10-min epoch |
Genotype | Session | Genotype x Session Interaction |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introducing shock |
Pretraining.1 vs Training 1.1 |
F1,12 = 9.71 P = 0.009 |
F1,12 = 7.04 P < 0.02 |
F1,12 = 0.36 P = 0.56 |
| Learning | Training 1.1 vs Training 3.1 |
F1,11 = 3.52 P = 0.09 |
F1,11 = 0.004 P = 0.95 |
F1,11 = 1.91 P = 0.19 |
| 24-h Retention | Training 3.1 vs Retention.1 |
F1,15 = 0.99 P = 0.33 |
F1,15 = 10.7 P = 0.005 |
F1,15 = 4.63 P < 0.05 |
| Conflict | Training 3.1 vs Conflict.1 |
F1,6 = 0.25 P = 0.63 |
F1,6 = 1.19 P = 0.32 |
F1,6 = 3.2 P = 0.13 |
| Extinction start | Retention.1 vs Extinction 1.1 |
F1,7 = 0.18 P = 0.68 |
F1,7 = 2.56 P = 0.15 |
F1,7 = 0.91 P = 0.37 |
| Extinction end | Retention.3 vs Extinction 1.3 |
F1,7 = 1.81 P = 0.22 |
F1,7 = 0.59 P = 0.46 |
F1,7 = 0.03 P = 0.86 |
| Retention of Extinction |
Extinction 1.1 vs Extinction 2.1 |
F1,7 = 0.16 P = 0.70 |
F1,7 = 0.008 P = 0.93 |
F1,7 = 0.29 P = 0.30 |