Skip to main content
. 2016 Mar 5;11:435–449. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2016.02.019

Table 3.

Confusion matrix of the classification results using visual ratings. Both the absolute and relative classification results are presented. Each row shows the clinical diagnosis and each column shows the suggested diagnosis by the classifier.

CN AD FTD DLB VaD CN AD FTD DLB VaD
CN 77 8 0 28 5 CN 65% 7% 0% 24% 4%
AD 25 65 62 64 7 AD 11% 29% 28% 29% 3%
FTD 8 21 46 13 4 FTD 9% 23% 50% 14% 4%
DLB 9 13 3 20 2 DLB 19% 28% 6% 43% 4%
VaD 0 3 1 3 17 VaD 0% 13% 4% 13% 71%