Skip to main content
. 2005 Apr 2;330(7494):753. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38356.424606.8F

Table 4.

Reasons for omitting one or more outcomes per trial; based on 69 survey responses with unreported efficacy or harm outcomes in randomised trials published in December 2000 and cited in PubMed

No (%) of trials
Reason* Efficacy outcomes (n=59) Harm outcomes (n=16)
Space constraints: 28 (47) 4 (25)
Journal imposed 11 (19) 1 (6)
Author imposed 21 (36) 3 (19)
Not clinically important 22 (37) 12 (75)
Not statistically significant 14 (24) 8 (50)
Not yet submitted 13 (22) 1 (6)
Not yet analysed 10 (17) 1 (6)
*

Reasons are not mutually exclusive (>1 may have been given per trial).

P≥0.05 in all inter-group comparisons.