Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 May 17.
Published in final edited form as: J Alzheimers Dis. 2018;62(4):1691–1702. doi: 10.3233/JAD-170840

Table 5.

Influence of Race on association between FTP SUVR and amyloid

Data type Predictor Estimate SE t value p value Adj. p value
(10 tests)
CP SUVR
pvc PiB DVR 0.030 0.261 0.114 0.910 >1.000
non-pvc PiB DVR 0.004 0.088 0.046 0.963 >1.000
HC SUVR
pvc PiB DVR 0.194 0.073 2.671 0.008 0.085
non-pvc PiB DVR 0.120 0.051 2.331 0.021 0.212
residual HC SUVR
pvc PiB DVR 0.188 0.056 3.335 0.001 0.011
non-pvc PiB DVR 0.118 0.034 3.459 0.001 0.007
HC SUVR
pvc PiB DVR * Race −0.204 0.301 −0.677 0.499 >1.000
non-pvc PiB DVR * Race 0.114 0.213 0.536 0.593 >1.000
residual HC SUVR
pvc PiB DVR * Race −0.532 0.230 −2.317 0.022 0.219
non-pvc PiB DVR * Race −0.176 0.141 −1.248 0.214 >1.000

Adj. p, p values adjusted for multiple comparison using the Bonferroni method; CP, choroid plexus; HC, hip-pocampus; PiB DVR, 11C-Pittsburg Compound B Distribution Volume Ratio; pvc, partial volume correction using geometric transfer matrix method; SE, standard error; SUVR, standardized uptake value ratio. NOTE: CDR > 0 participants were included in the sample used here (N = 147). Cerebellar cortex was used as reference for all SUVR shown. Separate multiple linear regression models were run. All models covarying for race, age, sex, and education. Bold values indicate significant association between FTP measurements in the CP and nearby ROI (p < 0.05).