Skip to main content
. 2018 Dec 13;23(50):1800228. doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2018.23.50.1800228

Table 4. Comparison of Nanopore mapping data across library kits, United Kingdom, 2017a (n = 8 samples).

Platform Kit
information
Flow cell
(FLO-)
Virus
identified
Total
reads (nt)
% reads
mapping
% 20x
coverage
% 10x
coverage
Referenceb Reference
size (nt)
Max
de novo contig (nt)
Illumina Nextera XT NA CHIKV 1,391,258 95.23 98.86 99.37 CHIKV 11,826 7,321
Illumina Nextera XT NA DENV 1,391,258 0.22 63.66 77.82 DENV1 10,735 6,613
MinION 2D SQK-LSK208 MIN106 CHIKV 1,891,028 85.12 99.73 99.91 CHIKV 11,826 10,793
MinION 2D SQK-LSK208 MIN106 DENV 1,891,028 0.43 95.99 96.09 DENV1 10,735 7,549
MinION 1D2 SQK-LSK308 MIN107 CHIKV 5,080,906 74.50 99.94 100 CHIKV 11,826 11,369
MinION 1D2 SQK-LSK308 MIN107 DENV 5,080,906 0.37 95.04 96.42 DENV1 10,735 2,199
MinION Rapid SQK-RBK001 MIN106 CHIKV 611,110 66.26 99.66 99.68 CHIKV 11,826 11,473
MinION Rapid SQK-RBK001 MIN106 DENV 611,110 0.29 81.09 90.83 DENV1 10,735 4,227

CHIKV: chikungunya virus; Ct: cycle threshold; DENV: dengue virus. NA: not applicable.

a Results presented in the table were obtained in 2017 on samples that had been collected and found positive for chikungunya or dengue virus by real-time reverse transcription-PCR in 2016.

b For DENV the serotype is also indicated.