Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Feb 25.
Published in final edited form as: J Theor Biol. 2003 Jul 7;223(1):1–18. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5193(03)00035-3

Table 2.

Definition of the symbols for pseudo-nodes used in Fig. 3

Symbol of pseudo-node Relation to parent node(s)
Complementary nodes
EN¯ not EN
hh¯ not hh
HH¯ not HH
PTC¯ not PTC
SLP¯ not SLP
SMO¯ not SMO
Composite nodes corresponding to a single cell
(CAECR¯)2 CIA2 and EN2¯ and CIR2¯
(CASCR¯)2 CIA2 and SLP2 and CIR2¯
(CSM)2 CI2 and SMO2
(ECR¯)2 EN2 and CIR2¯
(wCACR¯)2 wg2 and CIA2 and CIR2¯
(wSCR¯)2 wg2 and SLP2 and CIR2¯
Composite nodes corresponding to intercellular interactions
Cihj CIi and hhj
CiSMihjhk¯ CIi and SMO¯i and hhj¯ and hhk¯
PiHjHk¯ PTCi and HHj¯ and HHk¯
PiHj PTCi and HHj
WiSj WGi and SLPj

The state of each composite node is determined from the logical function giving its relation to the state of its “parent” nodes.