Skip to main content
Cell Proliferation logoLink to Cell Proliferation
. 2016 Jan 8;49(1):14–26. doi: 10.1111/cpr.12229

Induced pluripotent stem cells and Parkinson's disease: modelling and treatment

Xiaoyun Xu 1,, Jinsha Huang 1,, Jie Li 1, Ling Liu 1, Chao Han 1, Yan Shen 1, Guoxin Zhang 1, Haiyang Jiang 1, Zhicheng Lin 2, Nian Xiong 1, Tao Wang 1,
PMCID: PMC6495331  PMID: 26748765

Abstract

Many neurodegenerative disorders, such as Parkinson's disease (PD), are characterized by progressive neuronal loss in different regions of the central nervous system, contributing to brain dysfunction in the relevant patients. Stem cell therapy holds great promise for PD patients, including with foetal ventral mesencephalic cells, human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) and human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs). Moreover, stem cells can be used to model neurodegenerative diseases in order to screen potential medication and explore their mechanisms of disease. However, related ethical issues, immunological rejection and lack of canonical grafting protocols limit common clinical use of stem cells. iPSCs, derived from reprogrammed somatic cells, provide new hope for cell replacement therapy. In this review, recent development in stem cell treatment for PD, using hiPSCs, as well as the potential value of hiPSCs in modelling for PD, have been summarized for application of iPSCs technology to clinical translation for PD treatment.


Abbreviations

adeno‐iPSCs

adenoviral iPSCs

CD

cluster of differentiation

CM

cynomolgus macaque

DA

dopamine

DAT

dopamine transporter

DBS

deep brain stimulation

FACS

flow cytometric analysis

GBA

glucocerebrosidase

hESCs

human embryonic stem cells

hiPSCs

human induced pluripotent stem cells

LBs

Lewy bodies

LRRK2

leucine‐rich repeat kinase 2

MEF

mouse embryonic fibroblasts

MHC

major histocompatibility complex

mtDNA

mitochondrial DNA

NSCs

neural stem cells

PD

Parkinson's disease

SGZ

subgranular zone

SNCA

α‐synuclein

SNpc

substantia nigra pars compacta

SVZ

subventricular zone

VPA

valproic acid

ZFN

zinc finger nuclease

ZNS

zonisamide

Introduction

Parkinson's disease (PD) is the second most common neurodegenerative disorder, and concerns progressive loss of dopaminergic (DA) neurons in the substantia nigra pars compacta (SNpc) of the midbrain 1. The crucial pathological feature of PD is presence of Lewy bodies (LBs), which are abnormal aggregates of α‐synuclein (SNCA) protein. Reported standardized incidence rates of PD are 8–18 per 100 000 person‐years worldwide 2. In China, prevalence of PD for those aged ≥65 years is 1.7% 3. PD patients suffer from motor symptoms such as rest tremor, bradykinesia, rigidity and abnormal gait. Non‐motor symptoms, such as olfactory dysfunction, psychiatric changes and sleep disorders, further impair PD patients' quality of life. Up to now, multiple factors have been found to involve pathogenesis of PD, including genetic susceptibility, environmental toxins, interruption of autophagy, neuroinflammation and most importantly – advancing age. Although the precise mechanisms underlying the pathogenesis of PD are not well understood, interactions within these pathogenic factors give rise to loss of DA neurons within the SNpc. Unfortunately, current pharmacological and surgical treatments provide only insufficient symptomatic relief, but cannot reverse nor slow down the underlying loss of midbrain DA neurons. Stem cell transplantation, however, holds great promise in the treatment of PD.

Neural stem cells (NSCs) provide a potential endogenous source for neuron replacement therapy in neurodegenerative disorders such as PD. One of the most important essential features of NSCs is their proliferation potential. It has already been indicated that NSCs can differentiate directly into DA neurons and Suksuphew and Noisa have shown that they have high possibility for producing two undifferentiated daughter cells at early stages of development (symmetric division), and later cell division for production of differentiated neurons plus glial cells (asymmetric division) 4. A further feature of NSCs' multipotency is their potential to differentiate into astrocytes and oligodendrocytes, as well as into neurons 5, 6. NSCs in the subventricular zone (SVZ) can differentiate into olfactory neurons, while those of the subgranular zone (SGZ) can differentiate into granular neurons of the dentate gyrus 7. Furthermore, when implanted into developing eyes, hippocampal NSCs have exhibited several morphological and immunological properties of retinal cells, including photoreceptors 7. Differentiation of adult NSCs can be influenced by their local environment as well as by intrinsic programmes 8.

Human ESCs were the first human stem cells to be identified and cultured, by Thomson et al. in 1998 9, and were proven at that time to be self‐renewing and pluripotent. These properties indicated hESCs as having great promise for cell transplantation therapy. However, ethical concerns arose immediately as generation of hESCs requires destruction of the fertilized human embryo. A further significant problem with transplanting stem cells is associated with immunological rejection after transplantation of specific cells derived from allogeneic hESCs. In 2006, Yamanaka et al. reported generation of ES‐like pluripotent stem cells from somatic fibroblasts, the so‐called iPSCs 10. Since then, many methods have been explored to generate hiPSCs from a wide variety of easily accessible source tissues, including skin, adipose and blood cells 11, 12, 13, 14. Unlike hESCs, there are no ethical issues preventing use of iPSCs. Refinement of reprogramming methods now allows for iPSC generation without genomic integration of reprogramming factors, using expression plasmids, non‐integrating viruses, recombinant proteins, small molecules and synthetically modified mRNAs or miRNAs 15. Here, we review the existing iPSC‐based models and treatments, with particular emphasis on PD, and explore the challenges associated with cell therapies using iPSCs‐derived DA neurons, which have thus far hindered expansion of this research.

The long journey to optimize a iPSC‐derived DA neuron differentiation protocol

Cell replacement therapy with foetal ventral midbrain (VM) DA neurons has been shown, in some ways, to be beneficial to PD patients. Dopaminergic neurons lost in PD are primarily of the VM, and VM DA neurons arise from floor plate cells during embryonic development. The earliest study of DA neuron differentiation from mouse ESCs was performed by Lee et al. in 2000 16. This group generated CNS progenitor populations from ESCs, expanded the cells and promoted their differentiation into dopaminergic and serotonergic neurons in the presence of mitogens and specific signalling molecules. Their differentiation involved a number of steps: generation of embryoid bodies (EBs) without retinoic acid (RA) treatment in a serum‐containing medium, use of a defined medium to select for CNS stem cells, proliferation of CNS stem cells in the presence of mitogen, basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF), and differentiation of the stem cells by removal of the mitogen in serum‐free medium 16. Finally, the differentiation medium consisted of N2 medium supplemented with laminin, cAMP and ascorbic acid (AA). Sonic hedgehog (SHH), FGF8 and AA also enhanced differentiation to DA fate, and increased yield of ES‐derived TH+ neurons. The cells were incubated under differentiation conditions for 6–15 days at the last stage, in order to increase numbers of TH+ neurons and DA level 16. While this protocol succeeded in generating DA neurons at relatively high efficiency, extensive studies in Parkinsonian animals are needed to further assess complete function and safety of ESC‐derived DA neurons in vivo 16. Efficiency and purification of generated cell populations also needs to be improved by genetic methods.

After some months, Kawasaki and colleagues introduced an efficient method for generating neurons from ESCs by using PA6‐derived stromal cell‐derived inducing activity (SDIA) in a serum‐free condition requiring neither EBs nor RA treatment 17. High proportions of TH+ neurons producing DA were obtained from SDIA‐treated ESCs. When transplanted, SDIA‐induced dopaminergic neurons integrated into the mouse striatum and remained positive for TH expression 17. In accordance with Lee's group, Kawasaki et al. also avoided using RA in their experiment, as RA seemed to perturb neural patterning and neuronal identities in EBs, as a strong teratogen. Efficiency of DA neuron induction in the SDIA method is as high as maximum efficiency (~30%) obtained by Lee's method with SHH, FGF8 and ascorbate treatment 17. Neural induction by SDIA provided a new powerful tool for both basic neuroscience research and therapeutic applications.

Low efficiency of generation of DA neurons from primary cultures of foetal neonatal cells, or adult stem cells, limits their therapeutic potential as donor cells 18. In effort to improve efficiency of DA neuron generation, survival and maturation in vitro, Kim et al. used a cytomegalovirus plasmid (pCMV) driving expression of rat Nurr1 complementary DNA modified to establish stable Nurr1 ESC lines 18. Nurr1 ESCs raised the proportion of TH+ neurons up to 78%, combined with their previous five‐stage differentiation method 16, 18. They also demonstrated that these DA neurons from ESCs could functionally integrate into host tissue as well as lead to recovery in a rodent model of PD 18.

These results have subsequently been replicated using hESCs with some modifications, but efficiency was not satisfactory 19, 20, 21. Perrier et al. have reported that co‐culture of hESCs on MS5 stroma can yield highly efficient differentiation into midbrain DA neurons 22. Neural differentiation of hESCs was induced by means of co‐culture on MS5, MS5‐Wnt or S2 stroma at comparable efficiencies. Growth factors were added in various combinations and at various time points. Rosette structures were harvested mechanically from feeder layers on day 28 of differentiation and gently replanted on 15 μg/ml polyornithine/1 μg/ml laminin‐coated culture dishes in N2 medium supplemented with SHH, FGF8, AA and BDNF. These cells were resuspended in N2 medium, and replated again on to polyornithine/laminin‐coated culture dishes in the presence of SHH, FGF8, AA and BDNF. After additional 7–9 days culture, cells were found to have differentiated in the absence of SHH and FGF8 but in the presence of BDNF, glial cell line‐derived neurotrophic factor, transforming growth factor type β3, dibutyryl cAMP and AA 22. The workers observed that exposure to SHH and FGF8 from day 12 to day 20 differentiation, followed by differentiation in the presence of AA and BDNF, resulted in 3‐fold increase in TH+ cells. Up to 79% of all the neurons express TH, the rate‐limiting enzyme in the synthesis of DA. In addition to TH expression, cells in these cultures expressed key markers associated with normal midbrain DA neurons. However, the high‐yield midbrain DA neuron derivation protocol reported here need to be transplantated into pre‐clinical animal models of PD 22. Beyond this, cell survival and long‐term maintenance of phenotype are essential parameters for testing in vivo.

In 2008, a group of Korean scientists reported a method for differentiating hESCs into functional TH+ neurons, with up to near 86% total hESC‐derived neurons, the highest purity ever reported 23. The unique feature of their protocol was generation of pure spherical neural masses (SNMs). These SNMs could be expanded for long periods without losing their differentiation capability and could be coaxed into DA neurons efficiently within a relatively short time (approximately 2 weeks) when needed. SNM culture and DA neuron derivation from the SNMs did not need feeder cells, which reduced risks of contamination by unwanted cells and pathogens. More importantly, their hESC‐derived DA neurons induced clear behavioural recovery after transplantation in a Parkinsonian rat model, indicating their functionality in vivo 23.

It has been reported that bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) can differentiate into not only osteogenic, adipogenic, chondrogenic cells, but also into other lineages including myogenic, hepatic and neurogenic cells 24. Furthermore, they are inducible to differentiate into cells with the DA neuronal phenotype suggested by expression of TH, DAT markers, as well as synthesis and secretion of DA after appropriate stimuli 25. Previous studies have shown that human BMSC engraftment can alleviate motor dysfunction in Parkinsonian animal models, but with limited efficacy and but few engrafted cells surviving. Our team transplanted equal amounts of hBMSCs into hemi‐lesioned Parkinsonian rats with supplementation of bFGF, to assess whether a combination of bFGF and hBMSC therapy would enhance treatment effectiveness in PD rat models 26. As a result, bFGF promoted hBMSCs to transdifferentiate towards neural‐like lineages in vitro 26. In addition, hBMSC transplantation alleviated motor functional asymmetry, and prevented DA neurons from loss in the PD model, while bFGF administration enhanced neurodifferentiation capacity and therapeutic effect 26.

Similar strategies have been applied for differentiating hiPSCs into DA neurons. Cooper et al. postulated that a major limitation for experimental studies of current ESC/iPSC differentiation protocols, was lack of VM DA neurons of stable phenotype, as defined by expression marker code FOXA2/TH/β‐tubulin 27. They demonstrated a combination of three modifications that were required to produce VM DA neurons. First, early and specific exposure to low‐dose RA improved regional identity of neural progenitor cells derived from pluripotent stem cells. Secondly, a high activity form of human SHH established a sizeable FOXA2+ neural progenitor cell population in vitro. Thirdly, early exposure to FGF8a, rather than FGF8b, and WNT1 were required for robust differentiation of the FOXA2+ floor plate‐like human neural progenitor cells into FOXA2+ DA neurons 27. FOXA2+ DA neurons were also generated when this protocol was adapted to feeder‐free conditions. In summary, their new human ESC and iPSC differentiation protocol can generate human VM DA neurons as required for relevant new bioassays, drug discovery and cell‐based therapies for PD 27.

iPSC: for Parkinson's disease modelling

The majority of PD cases are sporadic with unknown cause. Age, oxidative stress, toxin and environmental factors are risk factors 2, and remaining 10% is familial PD, where several causative genes have been identified 28. Before stem cell modelling appeared, the most used cell or animal models for PD were generated with toxins such as rotenone, 6‐OHDA, MPTP or genetic models. The relationship between MPTP and PD was found in a cluster of young drug addicts, by Davis et al. in 1979 29. MPTP easily crosses the blood–brain barrier (BBB) where it is oxidized in glial cells into MPP+. MPP+ competes with DA for the DA transporter and after entering neurons, it exerts its toxic effect by inactivating complex I of the ETC 30. MPTP is commonly used to model for PD in primates and rodents in that the drug kills dopaminergic neurons, allowing researchers to study neuronal circuitry with reduced dopaminergic involvement 31. Many workers have demonstrated that MPTP administration is able to reproduce most, but not all, the clinical and pathological hallmarks of PD in monkeys 32, 33, 34 and, at least degeneration of dopaminergic neurons, in mice 35. Similar to MPTP, the pesticide rotenone disrupts complex I function of mitochondria 36. Our team has demonstrated that rotenone models for PD appear to mimic most clinical features of idiopathic PD and recapitulate the slow and progressive loss of DA neurons and LB formation in the nigral‐striatal system 36. Both MPTP and rotenone have been important for establishment of PD animal models. However, while they promote dopaminergic neuron death with associated motor impairment, their side effects and lack of specificity are major drawbacks 31. 6‐OHDA, a selective catecholaminergic neurotoxin, is used to generate lesions in the nigrostriatal DA neurons in rats 37. Unlike MPTP, 6‐OHDA cannot cross the BBB. So, 6‐OHDA must be injected into the SNc, medial forebrain bundle or striatum, to induce Parkinsonism, rather than systemic administration 38. Intrastriatal injection of 6‐OHDA causes progressive retrograde neuronal degeneration in the SNc and VTA 39, 40. Genetic models provide us with better understanding of underlying genetic forms of PD, even though their pathological and behavioural phenotypes are often quite different from the human condition 41. Many genetic variant models, including SNCA, LRRK2, PINK, Parkin, DJ‐1 and Glucocerebrosidase (GBA), have been generated to explore inherent mechanisms in PD 42, 43, 44, 45. The well‐established genetic models are able to interpret pathogenesis of only 5–10% familial PD, however, without replicating the entire genetic background of the patients in vitro 46. Moreover, differences between species in displaying neurodegenerative phenotypes make it difficult to extrapolate results obtained from animal models to humans 47. The discovery of iPSCs has for the first time enabled us to reproduce DA neurons from individuals who suffered from familial or sporadic PD 47, 48. Moreover, these iPSC models allow us to explore pathogenic factors and discover interactions between genetic and exogenous factors involved in the pathogenesis of PD. As individuals' responses to drug compounds varies, patient‐specific iPSCs may be used to distinguish between those individuals likely to respond to new therapeutics and those who are not, and more accurately predict toxicity and efficacy in screening drugs, from mechanisms, in comparison to animal models.

Differentiation of DA neurons from iPSCs has been demonstrated to be relatively robust and reproducible, allowing for generation of disease models from patients carrying a variety of mutations in key genes implicated in familial PD, including PARK2, PINK1, LRRK2, SNCA and GBA 49, 50. Among genetic risk factors, Parkin (PARK2) is the most frequently mutated gene that has causally been linked to autosomal recessive early‐onset familial PD 51. In patients with PD onset before the age 45, PARK2 mutations are seen in up to 50% of familial cases and about 15% of sporadic cases 52. Parkin knockout mouse models display some abnormalities, but do not fully recapitulate the pathophysiology of human PARK2. Jiang et al. generated iPSCs from normal subjects and PD patients with Parkin mutations and demonstrated that loss of Parkin in human midbrain DA neurons greatly increased expression of monoamine oxidases and oxidative stress, significantly reduced DA uptake and increased spontaneous DA release 53. These results suggest that Parkin controls dopamine utilization in human midbrain DA neurons by enhancing the precision of DA neurotransmission and suppressing DA oxidation 53. Imaizumi et al. used PARK2 patients' specific iPSCs‐derived neurons to recapitulate pathogenic changes in the brain of PARK2 patients 54. The data indicated that PARK2 iPSC‐derived neurons exhibited increased oxidative stress, impaired mitochondrial homoeostasis and SNCA accumulation 54. Recently, Ren et al. showed that the complexity of neuronal processes and microtubule stability were significantly reduced in iPSC‐derived neurons from PD patients with Parkin mutations 55, suggesting that Parkin maintains morphological complexity of human neurons by stabilizing microtubules 55. Shaltouki et al. observed reduced DA differentiation, accompanied by reduced mitochondrial volume ratio and abnormal mitochondrial ultrastructure, consistent with the current model of PARK2 mutations 48.

PINK1 functions upstream of Parkin, and is involved in recruiting Parkin to damaged mitochondria, for example, following mitochondrial depolarization 56. Mutations in either PARK2 or PINK1 result in impaired mitophagy. Cooper et al. found that PINK1 mutant iPSC‐derived DA neuronal cells were more sensitive to cell death and production of ROS elicited by mitochondrial and oxidative stressors, and further showed increased basal oxygen consumption and proton leakage suggestive of intrinsically damaged mitochondria 57. Moreover, cell vulnerability associated with mitochondrial function in iPSC‐derived neural cells could be rescued with coenzyme Q10, rapamycin or LRRK2 kinase inhibitor GW5074. These data demonstrate that iPSC‐derived neural cells are sensitive models for measuring vulnerability and dose–responses of candidate neuroprotective molecules and might help to identify disease causes and better individualize treatment efficacy 57.

Mutations in leucine‐rich repeat kinase 2 (LRRK2) are associated with sporadic and familial forms of PD. Nguyen et al. have reported that DA neurons derived from G2019S mutation‐iPSCs have high levels of expressions of key oxidative stress‐response genes and SNCA protein 58. The mutant neurons were more sensitive to caspase‐3 activation and cell death caused by exposure to stress agents, such as hydrogen peroxide, MG‐132 and 6‐hydroxydopamine 58. Cooper et al. indicated that LRRK2 G2019S and R1441C mutations reduced availability of substrates for oxidative phosphorylation, and were associated with disrupted mitochondrial movement in PD patient‐specific iPSCs 57. Laurie et al. further demonstrated the mechanisms by which LRRK2 mutations lead to loss of mitochondrial function. Their data revealed that mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) damage was induced in neural cells by PD‐associated mutations in LRRK2, and this phenotype could be functionally reversed or prevented by zinc finger nuclease (ZFN)‐mediated genome editing in iPSCs 59. These results indicate that mtDNA damage is likely to be a critical early event in neuronal dysfunction that leads ultimately to LRRK2‐related PD 59.

The first genetic cause identified for familial PD was SNCA, as PD can be caused by mutations in SNCA or by overexpression of normal SNCA via gene duplication or triplication, consistent with a gain‐of‐function mechanism. iPSC‐derived midbrain DA cultures from SNCA triplication patients exhibit several disease‐related phenotypes in culture, including accumulation of SNCA, inherent overexpression of markers of oxidative stress and sensitivity to peroxide‐induced oxidative stress 60. iPSCs, reprogrammed from patients with the most common A53T‐SNCA mutation, had high nitric oxide and 3‐NT levels compared to controls 61.

GBA mutations, which cause the lysosomal storage disorder Gaucher disease, have recently been linked to a 5‐fold greater risk of developing Parkinsonism than non‐carrier individuals 62, and are the strongest genetic risk factor for PD known to date. GBA1 mutated iPSC‐derived neurons have low glucocerebrosidase activity and protein levels, and high SNCA levels as well as autophagic and lysosomal defects 63. Mutant neurons display dysregulation of calcium homoeostasis and increased vulnerability to stress responses involving elevation of cytosolic calcium 63. These findings using iPSC technology, have provided evidence for a link between GBA1 mutations and complex changes in autophagic/lysosomal system and intracellular calcium homoeostasis, underlying vulnerability to neurodegeneration. As monozygotic twins share identical genetic makeup, twin studies have been valuable for dissecting complex gene‐environmental interactions in PD. Woodard et al., using iPSC technology 64, investigated a unique set of monozygotic twins and found that SNCA clearance was impaired in midbrain DA neurons carrying GBA N370S regardless of disease status. Moreover, DA levels of twins discordant for PD were different, suggesting that non‐genetic factors further perturbed DA homoeostasis in addition to GBA mutations. These results verified the interactions between genetic and environmental factors in the progress of PD, and offer a theoretical basis for personalized medicine in PD (Table 1).

Table 1.

Summary of publications using iPSCs for modelling PD with gene mutations

Gene Mutations Findings Publications
PARK2 Exon 3/5 deletion Increased the transcription of monoamine oxidases, oxidative stress and spontaneous DA release, reduced DA uptake Jiang et al. 53
Exon 2‐4 and exon 6,7 deletions Increased oxidative stress, impaired mitochondrial homoeostasis and SNCA accumulation Imaizumi et al. 54.
Exon 3,5 deletions Decreased complexity of neuronal processes and microtubule stability Ren et al. 55
R42P
EX3DEL R275W
Decreased DA differentiation, accompanied by reduced mitochondrial volume ratio and abnormal mitochondrial ultrastructure Shaltouki et al. 48.
PINK1 Q456X More sensitive to cell death and production of ROS elicited by mitochondrial and oxidative stressors, and increased basal oxygen consumption and proton leakage
Phenotype rescue using coenzyme Q10, rapamycin or the LRRK2 kinase inhibitor GW5074
Cooper et al. 57
LRRK2 G2019S Increased expression of key oxidative stress‐response genes and α‐synuclein
More sensitive to caspase‐3 activation and cell death caused by exposure to stress agents
Nguyen et al. 58
G2019S, R1441C Reduced the availability of substrates for oxidative phosphorylation, and disrupted mitochondrial movement Cooper et al. 57
G2019S, R1441C Induced mitochondrial DNA damage, and this phenotype can be functionally reversed or prevented by zinc finger nuclease (ZFN)‐mediated genome editing Sanders et al. 59
SNCA Triplication Accumulation of SNCA, overexpression of markers of oxidative stress, and sensitivity to peroxide induced oxidative stress Byers et al. 60
A53T Increased nitric oxide and 3‐NT levels Chung et al. 61
GBA1 L444P,
N370S
Reduced glucocerebrosidase activity and protein levels, increased α‐synuclein levels as well as autophagic and lysosomal defects
Dysregulation of calcium homoeostasis and increased vulnerability to stress responses involving elevation of cytosolic calcium
Schondorf et al. 63
N370S Impaired SNCA clearance regardless of disease status; non‐genetic factors further perturb DA homoeostasis in addition to GBA mutations Woodard et al. 64

Although the cause of sporadic PD is not fully understood, various factors including environmental toxins, genetic susceptibility and age, have been implicated. Isogenic hiPSC PD models show that toxin‐induced nitrosative/oxidative stress results in S‐nitrosylation of transcription factor MEF2C and this redox reaction inhibits MEF2C‐PGC1α transcriptional network, contributing to mitochondrial dysfunction and apoptotic cell death 65, suggesting that the MEF2C‐PGC1α pathway may be a new drug target for PD. The advance of iPSC technology now enables widespread development of PD models for dissecting molecular mechanisms that contribute to its disease pathogenesis.

iPSCs: for treating Parkinson's disease

As previously mentioned, there is currently no cure for PD except for some extent of relieving the symptoms. Current treatments include the use of oral medication of l‐DOPA dopamine receptor agonists, MAO‐B, apomorphine in more serious cases, continuous intestinal infusion of l‐DOPA, and deep brain stimulation (DBS) in subthalamic nucleus and globus pallidus by using surgically implanted electrodes 66. l‐DOPA is the gold standard for treatment of PD. Up to now, no medical nor surgical therapy has been shown to provide superior anti‐parkinsonian benefits than can be achieved with l‐DOPA 67. Unfortunately, its therapeutic effect is reduced after around 3–5 years use 68. The problems and limitations associated with long‐term use of l‐DOPA, including on‐off fluctuations and emergence of dyskinesia, facilitating exploration of better ways to restore dopamine neurotransmission. Dopamine receptor agonists are used as the first choice to delay initiation of l‐DOPA treatment, with longer plasma elimination half‐lives than l‐DOPA. Their mechanism of action are by stimulation of presynaptic and postsynaptic DA receptors so that their use has therefore been considered to be opportunity to improve continuous drug delivery 67. Selegiline was the first selective, irreversible inhibitor of monoamine oxidase type B (MAO‐B) used in treatment of PD, which can stabilize DA levels in the synaptic cleft 67. Because of its capacity for interfering with oxidative stress and for blocking MPTP toxicity, selegiline has been tested in the first major trial as a putative disease‐modifying agent 67. Rasagiline is another MAO‐B inhibitor, with different metabolites than selegiline, successfully developed for PD therapy. Good tolerance to rasagiline and its ease of use make it an appealing option at the start of therapy 67. DBS as surgical treatment has some serious limitations. It is costly and can produce cognitive disorders, which may be permanent 68. All of these treatments have considerable side effects such as ultimate loss of drug effect (‘wearing off’) during disease progression, occurrence of dyskinesia (notably with l‐DOPA) use, and appearance of non‐motor symptoms that are largely refractory to dopaminergic medication 69. The concept of using cell transplantation to substitute for loss of DA neurons in the brains of PD patients has evolved. In addition to conventional clinical treatments, such as pharmaceutical drugs and DBS, cell replacement therapy has offered a novel basis for development of effective therapeutic strategies for PD. In 1987, Brundin et al. first transplanted human VM tissue into the striatum of PD patients in Sweden, and the era of cell therapy for PD patients started 70. Various source tissues have been assessed for therapeutic replacement of DA neurons, such as hESC, hiPSC or DA grafts directly converted from somatic cells. Our team also has transplanted DiI‐labelled human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells (HUMSCs) to rotenone‐induced hemiparkinsonian rats 71. We showed that intra‐CPu transplantation of DiI‐labelled HUMSCs 4 weeks after rotenone administration ameliorated APO‐induced rotations gradually over a period of 12 months, indicating long‐term therapeutic effect of this approach 71. By monitoring red fluorescence of DiI, we found that HUMSCs migrated in the lesioned cerebral hemisphere, from CPu to SNc, or even to the opposite hemisphere through the corpus callosum. HUMSCs survived for up to 12 months after transplantation, and differentiated into Nestin‐, NSE‐, GFAP‐ and TH‐positive cells in the CPu and TH+ cells in the SNc. No tumour‐like structures was observed in implanted CPu 71. As reported, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is a neurotrophic factor which has been proven to promote growth and survival of DA neurons in VM explants and animal models for PD 72, 73, 74. Our previous work has also indicated that relatively low‐level expression of VEGF in the striatum protects DA neurons of Parkinsonian rats 75. Next, we developed a more effective neurorestorative and neuroregenerative therapy combining VEGF and HUMSC 76. As a result, intrastriatal infusion VEGF‐expressing HUMSCs to rotenone‐induced Parkinsonian rats provided a significant behavioural improvement, more significant than HUMSC transplantation alone, and resulted in revival of TH immunoreactivity in the lesioned striatum and SNc 76. Importantly, VEGF expression enhanced neuroprotective effects by promoting DA neuron‐orientated differentiation of the HUMSCs. Thus, our findings have presented the suitability of HUMSC as a vector for gene therapy and suggested that stem cell engineering with VEGF may improve transplantation strategies for PD treatment 76.

iPSCs, induced pluripotent cells, have the potential capacity for self‐renewal and are able to differentiate into any somatic cells, including DA neurons 77. Alternatively, iPSCs have properties similar to ESCs but can be generated from adult human cells such as skin, adipose tissue and fibroblasts 10. Thus, they are ethically more acceptable than some other stem cells sources. In theory, iPSCs from patients are without risk of immunological rejection for autografting 78.

Before successfully generating hiPSCs, many efforts had been made in animal experiments. In 2006, Yamanaka et al. generated iPSCs from mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEF) and adult mouse tail‐tip fibroblasts, by retrovirus‐mediated transfection of four transcription factors, Oct3/4, Sox2, c‐Myc and Klf4 10. One year later, iPSCs were derived by the same group 79 by viral reprogramming of human skin fibroblasts with the same four factors. These studies opened a new avenue for generating patient‐ and disease‐specific pluripotent stem cells. Wernig et al. used 6‐OHDA‐lesioned rats to examine whether DA neurons derived from directly reprogrammed fibroblasts had therapeutic potential for PD animals 78. As a result, in the striatum of rats grafted with differentiated iPSCs, a large number of TH+ cells with complex morphologies have been observed, these grafted stem cells were also positive for En1, VMAT2 and DAT. Four of the five transplanted animals which contained large numbers of TH+ neurons showed marked recovery of rotation behaviour 4 weeks after transplantation 78.

Kikuchi et al. first grafted hiPSC‐derived DA neurons into the brains of an MPTP‐lesioned Parkinsonian monkey, which survived as DA neurons as long as 6 months 80. In order to reduce immune rejection, Deleidi et al. generated iPSCs from cynomolgus macaque (CM) skin fibroblasts carrying specific major histocompatibility complex (MHC) haplotypes, observing that neither tumour formation nor inflammatory reactions occurred in the transplanted animals, up to 6 months after transplantation 81. Concerning the aspect of directed differentiation of iPSC into DA neurons, Sánchez‐Danes et al. indicated lentiviral vectors driving controlled expression of LMX1A was an efficient way to generate enriched populations of human VM DA neurons 82. However, Mak et al. revealed that the protocol using dorsomorphin and SB431542 to replace SHH with purmorphamine or smoothened agonist could greatly improve conversion of hiPSCs to the neuronal lineage 83. These histocompatible iPSCs may allow pre‐clinical validation of safety and efficacy of iPSCs for PD.

Two commonly used anti‐convulsants drugs, valproic acid (VPA) and zonisamide (ZNS), have been tested to promote differentiation of iPSC‐derived DA neurons 84. As iPSC‐derived donor cells inevitably contain tumourigenic or inappropriate cells, finding better protocols to purify and sort iPSCs is urgent. Doi et al. have shown that hiPSC‐derived DA progenitor cells can be efficiently isolated by cell sorting using a floor plate marker, CORIN 85. When transplanted into 6‐OHDA‐lesioned rats, CORIN+ cells survived and differentiated into midbrain DA neurons in vivo, resulting in significant improvement in motor behaviour, without tumour formation 85. Recently, Hallett et al. analysed CM iPSC‐derived midbrain DA neurons for up to 2 years following autologous transplantation in a PD model. They observed that unilateral engraftment of CM‐iPSCs provided gradual onset of functional motor improvement, and increased motor activity, without any need for immunosuppression. Postmortem analyses demonstrated robust survival of midbrain‐like DA neurons and extensive outgrowth into the transplanted putamen 86. These experiments offered strong immunological, functional and biological rationales for using midbrain DA neurons derived from iPSCs for future cell replacement in PD (Table 2).

Table 2.

Summary of publications using iPSCs for treating PD

Cell sources Subjects Effectiveness Publications
DA neurons derived from directly reprogrammed fibroblasts 6‐OHDA‐lesioned rats A large number of TH‐positive cells were observed in the striatum, which were also positive for En1, VMAT2 and DAT; animals showed a marked recovery of the rotation behaviour 4 weeks after transplantation Wernig et al. 78
DA neurons derived from hiPSCs MPTP‐lesioned monkeys Grafted neurons survived as DA neurons as long as 6 months Kikuchi et al. 80
IPSCs from Cynomolgus macaque skin fibroblasts carrying specific major histocompatibility complex haplotypes 6‐OHDA‐lesioned rats Neither tumour formation nor inflammatory reactions happened in the transplanted animals up to 6 months after transplantation Deleidi et al. 81
CORIN+ hiPSC‐derived DA progenitor cells 6‐OHDA‐lesioned rats The CORIN+ cells survived and differentiated into mDA neurons in vivo, significant improvement of the motor behaviour, without tumour formation Doi et al. 85
cynomolgus monkey iPSC‐derived midbrain DA neurons MPTP‐lesioned cynomolgus monkey (CM) A gradual onset of functional motor improvement, and increased motor activity, without a need for immunosuppression; robust survival of midbrain‐like DA neurons and extensive outgrowth into the transplanted putamen Hallett et al. 86

Challenges for iPSC‐derived cell therapies in Parkinson's disease

Although pre‐clinical studies concerning iPSCs‐derived cell therapies have shown great achievement, yet, some limitations hinder clinical usage of iPSCs for PD treatment. Tumourigenicity of iPSCs is an an important putative problem. Murine iPSCs and ESCs both form teratomas when transplanted into syngeneic mice. Also, hiPSCs and hESCs generate teratomas when injected into immunodeficient mice 87. A standardized sensitive teratoma assay to detect low numbers of tumour‐forming cells within a therapeutic cell preparation would be highly valuable. Gropp et al. presented detailed characterization of an efficient, quantitative, sensitive and easy‐to‐perform teratoma assay 87. These tumours may be benign (also, they may be malignant), although even so can become fatal when very large. In some studies, when teratomas have been removed from mice, the animals survived 88. Importantly, aggressiveness of teratocarcinomas from iPSCs is greater than that of ESCs 88. Differences in oncogenicity between ESCs and iPSCs might be due to their different approach of being derived 88. As hiPSCs have been first derived by transduction of human dermal fibroblasts with integrating viruses carrying four transcription factors Oct4, Sox2, c‐Myc and Klf4 79, c‐Myc is a well‐established oncogene while the other three transcription factors are known to be highly expressed in various types of cancer 89, 90, 91. Yamanaka et al. subsequently reported a further Myc family member, L‐Myc, as well as C‐Myc mutants (W136E and dN2), all of which indicated little transformational activity, promoting hiPSC generation more efficiently and specifically compared to WT C‐Myc 32. A further cause of tumourigenicity may be attributed to random integration of foreign DNA into the host genome disrupting important genes or activating oncogenes, potentially leading to uncontrollable growth of cells 92.

Stadtfeld et al. generated mouse iPSCs from fibroblasts and liver cells by using non‐integrating adenoviruses transiently expressing Oct4, Sox2, Klf4 and c‐Myc 93. These adenoviral iPSCs (adeno‐iPSCs) showed DNA demethylation characteristic of reprogrammed cells, expressed endogenous pluripotency genes and formed teratomas 93. Their work indicated that insertional mutagenesis was not required for in vitro reprogramming 93. Thus, more than 2 years after establishment of iPSC technology by Yamanaka's group, these newly generated adeno‐iPSCs have been the first reported reprogrammed pluripotent stem cells with evidence of complete lack of viral transgene integration 94. Yamanaka et al. described an alternative method to generate iPSCs from MEFs by continual transfection of plasmid vectors free from plasmid integration 95; this protocol took around 2 months to complete, from MEF isolation to iPSC establishment. The virus‐free technique reduced safety concerns for iPSC generation and application, and have provided a source of cells for investigation of mechanisms underlying reprogramming and pluripotency 95. Introducing mRNA directly into host cells without altering their genomic makeup or using episomal DNA‐based vectors which seldom integrate into the host genome, holds the potential to solve this problem, by providing sufficient reprogramming factor expression for successful transformation of somatic cells 96, 97, 98.

Anokye‐Danso et al. showed that expression of the miR302/367 cluster rapidly and efficiently reprogramed mouse and human somatic cells to an iPSC state without requirement for exogenous transcription factors 99. This miRNA‐based reprogramming approach was two orders of magnitude more efficient than standard Oct4/Sox2/Klf4/Myc‐mediated methods, and the miR302/367 iPSCs displayed characteristics similar to the Oct4/Sox2/Klf4/Myc‐iPSCs 99.

A further problem which hinders iPSCs treatment is that the therapeutic effect can be influenced by inherent pathogenic features of PD. Interactions between genetic and exogenous factors result in its pathogenesis. A general concern about use of autologous iPSC transplantation is whether underlying PD‐associated genetic mutations presented in transplanted neurons increases vulnerability of iPSC‐derived midbrain DA neurons to disease pathology. Environmental factors and age contribute largely to the pathogenesis of PD. Thus, iPSC‐derived neurons represent a reasonable strategy for more advantages. It has been shown that LBs, the pathological features of PD, can be found in grafts of foetal VM tissue 100, 101. The first reason is that LB pathology is a reaction to inflammation from host brain tissues, possibly mediated by cell stress induced by reactive microglia 102. Second, the spread of SNCA into the graft from the host may contribute to these pathological changes 103, 104. However, Barker et al. believe that these pathological changes are not likely to limit widespread adoption of cell treatments, as numbers of cells with LB‐like pathology in the grafts were small compared to numbers of healthy cells 105, 106, 107. Patients can still be functionally stable, more than a decade after such a graft, at a time when accumulation of SNCA had been observed 108, 109.

Apart from the potential risk of tumourigenicity or inherent pathogenic features deriving from donor cells, pluripotent stem cell‐derived cell populations for therapies also confer a risk for the contamination of transplantation cell populations with residual pluripotent cells 110. In order to resolve this issue, several sorting methods have been developed for enrichment of differentiated neural cell populations and elimination of pluripotent stem cells, using flow cytometric analysis (FACS) or MACS 111. Different combinations of CD markers have been explored to purify heterogeneous pluripotent stem cell‐derived neural cell populations. Pruszak et al. identified a cluster of differentiation (CD) surface antigen code for the neural lineage, based on combinatorial FACS of three distinct populations derived from hESCs: combinatorial CD15/CD24/CD29 marker profiles 112. They found that CD15(+)/CD29(HI)/CD24(LO) surface antigen expression defined NSCs, and this could eliminate tumour formation in vivo, resulting in pure neuronal grafts 112. Yuan et al. performed an unbiased FACS‐ and image‐based immunophenotyping analysis using 190 antibodies to cell surface markers on pluripotent stem cells 113. From this analysis they isolated a population of NSC that were CD184(+)/CD271(‐)/CD44(‐)/CD24(+) from neural induction cultures of hESCs and hiPSCs 113. To improve the sorting method, Sundberg et al. sorted primate iPSC‐derived neural cell population with NCAM+/CD29low selection 111. They demonstrated that teh NCAM+/CD29low selection method enriched the FOXA2/TH and EN1/TH+ DA neurons in vitro compared to unsorted cell populations from >10% prior to sorting to > 35% after sorting. Importantly, sorting with NCAM+/CD29low selection prior to transplantation eliminated non‐neural tumourigenic cells from the grafts and significantly increased the number of TH+ cells in the cell grafts compared to unsorted cell populations 111.

Conclusion

In this review, we have summarized a number of scientific and ethical issues in modelling and treatment with iPSCs for PD. iPSCs can be employed as relevant Parkinsonian cell models, for drug screening, studying disease progression and most importantly for treatment of PD by transplantation techniques. Compared with other stem cells, iPSCs stand out for their powerful pluripotency, few ethical issues and less immune rejection, although there are still several issues that need to be solved prior to translation of iPSCs into the clinical setting. First, the exact mechanisms of how transplanted cells restore host brain function and how to connect them with circumjacent brain tissues have not been yet elucidated. Second, tumourigenicity of iPSCs may surpass their therapeutic effects. Ultimately, iPSC, derived from autologous PD patients, may contain pathogenic gene mutations that affect prognosis of transplantation therapy. With improvements in differentiation methodologies and better understanding of pathogenesis of PD through patient‐specific iPSCs, iPSC therapy can be a potential alternative for PD treatment combined with traditional drug development platforms and gene therapy.

Conflict of Interest

There are no actual or potential conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by grants 31171211 and 81471305 from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (to TW), grant 81200983 from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (to NX), grant 81301082 from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (to JSH), grant 2012B09 from China Medical Foundation (to NX) and grant 0203201343 from Hubei Molecular Imaging Key Laboratory (to NX). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1. Olanow CW, Tatton WG (1999) Etiology and pathogenesis of Parkinson's disease. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 22, 123–144. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. de Lau LM, Breteler MM (2006) Epidemiology of Parkinson's disease. Lancet Neurol. 5, 525–535. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Zhang ZX, Roman GC, Hong Z, Wu CB, Qu QM, Huang JB et al (2005) Parkinson's disease in China: prevalence in Beijing, Xian, and Shanghai. Lancet 365, 595–597. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Suksuphew S, Noisa P (2015) Neural stem cells could serve as a therapeutic material for age‐related neurodegenerative diseases. World J Stem Cells 7, 502–511. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Reynolds BA, Weiss S (1992) Generation of neurons and astrocytes from isolated cells of the adult mammalian central nervous system. Science 255, 1707–1710. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. McKay R (1997) Stem cells in the central nervous system. Science 276, 66–71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Takahashi M, Palmer TD, Takahashi J, Gage FH (1998) Widespread integration and survival of adult‐derived neural progenitor cells in the developing optic retina. Mol. Cell Neurosci. 12, 340–348. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Gaiano N, Fishell G (1998) Transplantation as a tool to study progenitors within the vertebrate nervous system. J. Neurobiol. 36, 152–161. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Thomson JA, Itskovitz‐Eldor J, Shapiro SS, Waknitz MA, Swiergiel JJ, Marshall VS et al (1998) Embryonic stem cell lines derived from human blastocysts. Science 282, 1145–1147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Takahashi K, Yamanaka S (2006) Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic and adult fibroblast cultures by defined factors. Cell 126, 663–676. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Aasen T, Izpisua Belmonte JC (2010) Isolation and cultivation of human keratinocytes from skin or plucked hair for the generation of induced pluripotent stem cells. Nat. Protoc. 5, 371–382. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Haase A, Olmer R, Schwanke K, Wunderlich S, Merkert S, Hess C et al (2009) Generation of induced pluripotent stem cells from human cord blood. Cell Stem Cell 5, 434–441. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Loh YH, Agarwal S, Park IH, Urbach A, Huo H, Heffner GC et al (2009) Generation of induced pluripotent stem cells from human blood. Blood 113, 5476–5479. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Utikal J, Maherali N, Kulalert W, Hochedlinger K (2009) Sox2 is dispensable for the reprogramming of melanocytes and melanoma cells into induced pluripotent stem cells. J. Cell Sci. 122, 3502–3510. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Gonzalez F, Boue S, Izpisua Belmonte JC (2011) Izpisua Belmonte JC. Methods for making induced pluripotent stem cells: reprogramming a la carte. Nat. Rev. Genet. 12, 231–242. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Lee SH, Lumelsky N, Studer L, Auerbach JM, McKay RD (2000) Efficient generation of midbrain and hindbrain neurons from mouse embryonic stem cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 18, 675–679. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Kawasaki H, Mizuseki K, Nishikawa S, Kaneko S, Kuwana Y, Nakanishi S et al (2000) Induction of midbrain dopaminergic neurons from ES cells by stromal cell‐derived inducing activity. Neuron 28, 31–40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Kim JH, Auerbach JM, Rodriguez‐Gomez JA, Velasco I, Gavin D et al (2002) Dopamine neurons derived from embryonic stem cells function in an animal model of Parkinson's disease. Nature 418, 50–56. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Zhang SC, Wernig M, Duncan ID, Brustle O, Thomson JA (2001) In vitro differentiation of transplantable neural precursors from human embryonic stem cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 19, 1129–1133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Carpenter MK, Inokuma MS, Denham J, Mujtaba T, Chiu CP, Rao MS (2001) Enrichment of neurons and neural precursors from human embryonic stem cells. Exp. Neurol. 172, 383–397. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Park S, Lee KS, Lee YJ, Shin HA, Cho HY, Wang KC et al (2004) Generation of dopaminergic neurons in vitro from human embryonic stem cells treated with neurotrophic factors. Neurosci. Lett. 359, 99–103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Perrier AL, Tabar V, Barberi T, Rubio ME, Bruses J, Topf N et al (2004) Derivation of midbrain dopamine neurons from human embryonic stem cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 12543–12548. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Cho MS, Lee YE, Kim JY, Chung S, Cho YH, Kim DS et al (2008) Highly efficient and large‐scale generation of functional dopamine neurons from human embryonic stem cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 3392–3397. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Ye M, Wang XJ, Zhang YH, Lu GQ, Liang L, Xu JY et al (2007) Therapeutic effects of differentiated bone marrow stromal cell transplantation on rat models of Parkinson's disease. Parkinsonism Relat. Disord. 13, 44–49. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Trzaska KA, Kuzhikandathil EV, Rameshwar P (2007) Specification of a dopaminergic phenotype from adult human mesenchymal stem cells. Stem Cells 25, 2797–2808. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Xiong N, Yang H, Liu L, Xiong J, Zhang Z, Zhang X et al (2013) bFGF promotes the differentiation and effectiveness of human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells in a rotenone model for Parkinson's disease. Environ. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 36, 411–422. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Cooper O, Hargus G, Deleidi M, Blak A, Osborn T, Marlow E et al (2010) Differentiation of human ES and Parkinson's disease iPS cells into ventral midbrain dopaminergic neurons requires a high activity form of SHH, FGF8a and specific regionalization by retinoic acid. Mol. Cell Neurosci. 45, 258–266. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Corti O, Lesage S, Brice A (2011) What genetics tells us about the causes and mechanisms of Parkinson's disease. Physiol. Rev. 91, 1161–1218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Davis GC, Williams AC, Markey SP, Ebert MH, Caine ED, Reichert CM et al (1979) Chronic Parkinsonism secondary to intravenous injection of meperidine analogues. Psychiatry Res. 1, 249–254. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Trevor AJ, Castagnoli N, Singer TP (1988) The formation of reactive intermediates in the MAO‐catalyzed oxidation of the nigrostriatal toxin 1‐methyl‐4‐phenyl‐1,2,3,6‐tetrahydropyridine (MPTP). Toxicology 49, 513–519. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Valadas JS, Vos M, Verstreken P (2015) Therapeutic strategies in Parkinson's disease: what we have learned from animal models. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1338, 16–37. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Chiueh CC, Markey SP, Burns RS, Johannessen JN, Jacobowitz DM, Kopin IJ (1984) Neurochemical and behavioral effects of 1‐methyl‐4‐phenyl‐1,2,3,6‐ tetrahydropyridine (MPTP) in rat, guinea pig, and monkey. Psychopharmacol. Bull. 20, 548–553. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Langston JW, Forno LS, Rebert CS, Irwin I (1984) Selective nigral toxicity after systemic administration of 1‐methyl‐4‐phenyl‐1,2,5,6‐tetrahydropyrine (MPTP) in the squirrel monkey. Brain Res. 292, 390–394. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Doudet D, Gross C, Lebrun‐Grandie P, Bioulac B (1985) MPTP primate model of Parkinson's disease: a mechanographic and electromyographic study. Brain Res. 335, 194–199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Heikkila RE, Hess A, Duvoisin RC (1984) Dopaminergic neurotoxicity of 1‐methyl‐4‐phenyl‐1,2,5,6‐tetrahydropyridine in mice. Science 224, 1451–1453. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Xiong N, Long X, Xiong J, Jia M, Chen C, Huang J et al (2012) Mitochondrial complex I inhibitor rotenone‐induced toxicity and its potential mechanisms in Parkinson's disease models. Crit. Rev. Toxicol. 42, 613–632. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Ungerstedt U (1968) 6‐Hydroxy‐dopamine induced degeneration of central monoamine neurons. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 5, 107–110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Blandini F, Armentero MT, Martignoni E (2008) The 6‐hydroxydopamine model: news from the past. Parkinsonism Relat. Disord. 14(Suppl 2), S124–S129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Sauer H, Oertel WH (1994) Progressive degeneration of nigrostriatal dopamine neurons following intrastriatal terminal lesions with 6‐hydroxydopamine: a combined retrograde tracing and immunocytochemical study in the rat. Neuroscience 59, 401–415. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Przedborski S, Levivier M, Jiang H, Ferreira M, Jackson‐Lewis V, Donaldson D et al (1995) Dose‐dependent lesions of the dopaminergic nigrostriatal pathway induced by intrastriatal injection of 6‐hydroxydopamine. Neuroscience 67, 631–647. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Blesa J, Przedborski S (2014) Parkinson's disease: animal models and dopaminergic cell vulnerability. Front. Neuroanat. 8, 155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Morais VA, Haddad D, Craessaerts K, De Bock PJ, Swerts J, Vilain S et al (2014) PINK1 loss‐of‐function mutations affect mitochondrial complex I activity via NdufA10 ubiquinone uncoupling. Science 344, 203–207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Lachenmayer ML, Yue Z (2012) Genetic animal models for evaluating the role of autophagy in etiopathogenesis of Parkinson disease. Autophagy 8, 1837–1838. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Joselin AP, Hewitt SJ, Callaghan SM, Kim RH, Chung YH, Mak TW et al (2012) ROS‐dependent regulation of Parkin and DJ‐1 localization during oxidative stress in neurons. Hum. Mol. Genet. 21, 4888–4903. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Nieto M, Gil‐Bea FJ, Dalfo E, Cuadrado M, Cabodevilla F, Sanchez B et al (2006) Increased sensitivity to MPTP in human alpha‐synuclein A30P transgenic mice. Neurobiol. Aging 27, 848–856. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Chen C, Xiao SF (2011) Induced pluripotent stem cells and neurodegenerative diseases. Neuroscience Bulletin 27, 107–114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Seibler P, Graziotto J, Jeong H, Simunovic F, Klein C, Krainc D (2011) Mitochondrial Parkin recruitment is impaired in neurons derived from mutant PINK1 induced pluripotent stem cells. J. Neurosci. 31, 5970–5976. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Shaltouki A, Sivapatham R, Pei Y, Gerencser Akos A, Momčilović O, Rao Mahendra S et al (2015) Mitochondrial alterations by PARKIN in dopaminergic neurons using PARK2 patient‐specific and PARK2 knockout isogenic iPSC lines. Stem Cell Reports 4, 847–859. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Ross CA, Akimov SS (2014) Human‐induced pluripotent stem cells: potential for neurodegenerative diseases. Hum. Mol. Genet. 23, R17–R26. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Badger JL, Cordero‐Llana O, Hartfield EM, Wade‐Martins R. (2014) Parkinson's disease in a dish – using stem cells as a molecular tool. Neuropharmacology 76 (Pt A), 88–96. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Abbas N, Lucking CB, Ricard S, Durr A, Bonifati V, De Michele G et al (1999) A wide variety of mutations in the parkin gene are responsible for autosomal recessive parkinsonism in Europe. French Parkinson's Disease Genetics Study Group and the European Consortium on Genetic Susceptibility in Parkinson's Disease. Hum. Mol. Genet. 8, 567–574. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Lucking CB, Durr A, Bonifati V, Vaughan J, De Michele G, Gasser T et al (2000) Association between early‐onset Parkinson's disease and mutations in the parkin gene. N. Engl. J. Med. 342, 1560–1567. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Jiang H, Ren Y, Yuen EY, Zhong P, Ghaedi M, Hu Z et al (2012) Parkin controls dopamine utilization in human midbrain dopaminergic neurons derived from induced pluripotent stem cells. Nat. Commun. 3, 668. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Imaizumi Y, Okada Y, Akamatsu W, Koike M, Kuzumaki N, Hayakawa H et al (2012) Mitochondrial dysfunction associated with increased oxidative stress and alpha‐synuclein accumulation in PARK2 iPSC‐derived neurons and postmortem brain tissue. Mol. Brain 5, 35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Ren Y, Jiang H, Hu Z, Fan K, Wang J, Janoschka S et al (2015) Parkin mutations reduce the complexity of neuronal processes in iPSC‐derived human neurons. Stem Cells 33, 68–78. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Deas E, Wood NW, Plun‐Favreau H (2011) Mitophagy and Parkinson's disease: the PINK1‐parkin link. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1813, 623–633. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Cooper O, Seo H, Andrabi S, Guardia‐Laguarta C, Graziotto J, Sundberg M et al (2012) Pharmacological rescue of mitochondrial deficits in iPSC‐derived neural cells from patients with familial Parkinson's disease. Sci. Transl. Med. 4, 141ra190. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Nguyen HN, Byers B, Cord B, Shcheglovitov A, Byrne J, Gujar P et al (2011) LRRK2 mutant iPSC‐derived DA neurons demonstrate increased susceptibility to oxidative stress. Cell Stem Cell 8, 267–280. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Sanders LH, Laganiere J, Cooper O, Mak SK, Vu BJ, Huang YA et al (2014) LRRK2 mutations cause mitochondrial DNA damage in iPSC‐derived neural cells from Parkinson's disease patients: reversal by gene correction. Neurobiol. Dis. 62, 381–386. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Byers B, Cord B, Nguyen HN, Schule B, Fenno L, Lee PC et al (2011) SNCA triplication Parkinson's patient's iPSC‐derived DA neurons accumulate alpha‐synuclein and are susceptible to oxidative stress. PLoS ONE 6, e26159. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Chung CY, Khurana V, Auluck PK, Tardiff DF, Mazzulli JR, Soldner F et al (2013) Identification and rescue of alpha‐synuclein toxicity in Parkinson patient‐derived neurons. Science 342, 983–987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62. Sidransky E, Nalls MA, Aasly JO, Aharon‐Peretz J, Annesi G, Barbosa ER et al (2009) Multicenter analysis of glucocerebrosidase mutations in Parkinson's disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 361, 1651–1661. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63. Schondorf DC, Aureli M, McAllister FE, Hindley CJ, Mayer F, Schmid B et al (2014) iPSC‐derived neurons from GBA1‐associated Parkinson's disease patients show autophagic defects and impaired calcium homeostasis. Nat. Commun. 5, 4028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64. Woodard Chris M, Campos Brian A, Kuo S‐H, Nirenberg Melissa J, Nestor Michael W, Zimmer M et al (2014) iPSC‐derived dopamine neurons reveal differences between monozygotic twins discordant for Parkinson's disease. Cell Rep. 9, 1173–1182. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65. Ryan SD, Dolatabadi N, Chan SF, Zhang X, Akhtar MW, Parker J et al (2013) Isogenic human iPSC Parkinson's model shows nitrosative stress‐induced dysfunction in MEF2‐PGC1alpha transcription. Cell 155, 1351–1364. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66. Politis M, Lindvall O (2012) Clinical application of stem cell therapy in Parkinson's disease. BMC Med. 10, 1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67. Stocchi F, Vacca L, Radicati FG (2015) How to optimize the treatment of early stage Parkinson's disease. Transl. Neurodegener. 4, 4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68. Lane EL, Handley OJ, Rosser AE, Dunnett SB (2008) Potential cellular and regenerative approaches for the treatment of Parkinson's disease. Neuropsychiatr. Dis. Treat. 4, 835–845. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69. Jenner P (2015) Treatment of the later stages of Parkinson's disease – pharmacological approaches now and in the future. Transl. Neurodegener. 4, 3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70. Brundin P, Strecker RE, Lindvall O, Isacson O, Nilsson OG, Barbin G et al (1987) Intracerebral grafting of dopamine neurons. Experimental basis for clinical trials in patients with Parkinson's disease. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 495, 473–496. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71. Xiong N, Cao X, Zhang Z, Huang J, Chen C, Zhang Z et al (2010) Long‐term efficacy and safety of human umbilical cord mesenchymal stromal cells in rotenone‐induced hemiparkinsonian rats. Biol. Blood Marrow Transplant. 16, 1519–1529. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72. Pitzer MR, Sortwell CE, Daley BF, McGuire SO, Marchionini D, Fleming M et al (2003) Angiogenic and neurotrophic effects of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF165): studies of grafted and cultured embryonic ventral mesencephalic cells. Exp. Neurol. 182, 435–445. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73. Yasuhara T, Shingo T, Kobayashi K, Takeuchi A, Yano A, Muraoka K et al (2004) Neuroprotective effects of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) upon dopaminergic neurons in a rat model of Parkinson's disease. Eur. J. Neuorsci. 19, 1494–1504. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74. Yasuhara T, Shingo T, Muraoka K, Kameda M, Agari T, Wen Ji et al (2005) Neurorescue effects of VEGF on a rat model of Parkinson's disease. Brain Res. 1053, 10–18. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75. Tian YY, Tang CJ, Wang JN, Feng Y, Chen XW, Wang L et al (2007) Favorable effects of VEGF gene transfer on a rat model of Parkinson disease using adeno‐associated viral vectors. Neurosci. Lett. 421, 239–244. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76. Xiong N, Zhang Z, Huang J, Chen C, Zhang Z, Jia M et al (2011) VEGF‐expressing human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells, an improved therapy strategy for Parkinson's disease. Gene Ther. 18, 394–402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77. Brundin P, Barker RA, Parmar M (2010) Neural grafting in Parkinson's disease problems and possibilities. Prog. Brain Res. 184, 265–294. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78. Wernig M, Zhao JP, Pruszak J, Hedlund E, Fu D, Soldner F et al (2008) Neurons derived from reprogrammed fibroblasts functionally integrate into the fetal brain and improve symptoms of rats with Parkinson's disease. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 5856–5861. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79. Takahashi K, Tanabe K, Ohnuki M, Narita M, Ichisaka T, Tomoda K et al (2007) Induction of pluripotent stem cells from adult human fibroblasts by defined factors. Cell 131, 861–872. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80. Kikuchi T, Morizane A, Doi D, Onoe H, Hayashi T, Kawasaki T et al (2011) Survival of human induced pluripotent stem cell‐derived midbrain dopaminergic neurons in the brain of a primate model of Parkinson's disease. J. Parkinsons Dis. 1, 395–412. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81. Deleidi M, Hargus G, Hallett P, Osborn T, Isacson O (2011) Development of histocompatible primate‐induced pluripotent stem cells for neural transplantation. Stem Cells 29, 1052–1063. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82. Sanchez‐Danes A, Consiglio A, Richaud Y, Rodriguez‐Piza I, Dehay B, Edel M et al (2012) Efficient generation of A9 midbrain dopaminergic neurons by lentiviral delivery of LMX1A in human embryonic stem cells and induced pluripotent stem cells. Hum. Gene Ther. 23, 56–69. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83. Mak SK, Huang YA, Iranmanesh S, Vangipuram M, Sundararajan R, Nguyen L et al (2012) Small molecules greatly improve conversion of human‐induced pluripotent stem cells to the neuronal lineage. Stem Cells Int. 2012, 140427. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84. Yoshikawa T, Samata B, Ogura A, Miyamoto S, Takahashi J (2013) Systemic administration of valproic acid and zonisamide promotes differentiation of induced pluripotent stem cell‐derived dopaminergic neurons. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 7, 11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85. Doi D, Samata B, Katsukawa M, Kikuchi T, Morizane A, Ono Y et al (2014) Isolation of human induced pluripotent stem cell‐derived dopaminergic progenitors by cell sorting for successful transplantation. Stem Cell Reports 2, 337–350. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86. Hallett PJ, Deleidi M, Astradsson A, Smith GA, Cooper O, Osborn TM et al (2015) Successful function of autologous iPSC‐derived dopamine neurons following transplantation in a non‐human primate model of Parkinson's disease. Cell Stem Cell 16, 269–274. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87. Gropp M, Shilo V, Vainer G, Gov M, Gil Y, Khaner H et al (2012) Standardization of the teratoma assay for analysis of pluripotency of human ES cells and biosafety of their differentiated progeny. PLoS ONE 7, e45532. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88. Isobe K, Cheng Z, Nishio N, Suganya T, Tanaka Y, Ito S (2015) Reprint of “iPSCs, aging and age‐related diseases”. New Biotechnol. 32, 169–179. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89. Tian Y, Luo A, Cai Y, Su Q, Ding F, Chen H et al (2010) MicroRNA‐10b promotes migration and invasion through KLF4 in human esophageal cancer cell lines. J. Biol. Chem. 285, 7986–7994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90. Lambertini C, Pantano S, Dotto GP (2010) Differential control of Notch1 gene transcription by Klf4 and Sp3 transcription factors in normal versus cancer‐derived keratinocytes. PLoS ONE 5, e10369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91. Rageul J, Mottier S, Jarry A, Shah Y, Theoleyre S, Masson D et al (2009) KLF4‐dependent, PPARgamma‐induced expression of GPA33 in colon cancer cell lines. Int. J. Cancer 125, 2802–2809. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92. Nakagawa M, Takizawa N, Narita M, Ichisaka T, Yamanaka S (2010) Promotion of direct reprogramming by transformation‐deficient Myc. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 14152–14157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93. Stadtfeld M, Nagaya M, Utikal J, Weir G, Hochedlinger K (2008) Induced pluripotent stem cells generated without viral integration. Science 322, 945–949. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94. Eggenschwiler R, Cantz T (2009) Induced pluripotent stem cells generated without viral integration. Hepatology 49, 1048–1049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95. Okita K, Hong H, Takahashi K, Yamanaka S (2010) Generation of mouse‐induced pluripotent stem cells with plasmid vectors. Nat. Protoc. 5, 418–428. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96. Okita K, Matsumura Y, Sato Y, Okada A, Morizane A, Okamoto S et al (2011) A more efficient method to generate integration‐free human iPS cells. Nat. Methods 8, 409–412. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97. Yu J, Hu K, Smuga‐Otto K, Tian S, Stewart R, Slukvin II, et al (2009) Human induced pluripotent stem cells free of vector and transgene sequences. Science 324, 797–801. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98. Warren L, Manos PD, Ahfeldt T, Loh YH, Li H, Lau F et al (2010) Highly efficient reprogramming to pluripotency and directed differentiation of human cells with synthetic modified mRNA. Cell Stem Cell 7, 618–630. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99. Anokye‐Danso F, Trivedi CM, Juhr D, Gupta M, Cui Z, Tian Y et al (2011) Highly efficient miRNA‐mediated reprogramming of mouse and human somatic cells to pluripotency. Cell Stem Cell 8, 376–388. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100. Kordower JH, Chu Y, Hauser RA, Freeman TB, Olanow CW (2008) Lewy body‐like pathology in long‐term embryonic nigral transplants in Parkinson's disease. Nat. Med. 14, 504–506. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101. Li JY, Englund E, Holton JL, Soulet D, Hagell P, Lees AJ et al (2008) Lewy bodies in grafted neurons in subjects with Parkinson's disease suggest host‐to‐graft disease propagation. Nat. Med. 14, 501–503. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102. Gao HM, Kotzbauer PT, Uryu K, Leight S, Trojanowski JQ, Lee VM (2008) Neuroinflammation and oxidation/nitration of alpha‐synuclein linked to dopaminergic neurodegeneration. J. Neurosci. 28, 7687–7698. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103. Brundin P, Li JY, Holton JL, Lindvall O, Revesz T (2008) Research in motion: the enigma of Parkinson's disease pathology spread. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 9, 741–745. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104. Angot E, Steiner JA, Hansen C, Li JY, Brundin P (2010) Are synucleinopathies prion‐like disorders? Lancet Neurol. 9, 1128–1138. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105. Li JY, Englund E, Widner H, Rehncrona S, Bjorklund A, Lindvall O et al (2010) Characterization of Lewy body pathology in 12‐ and 16‐year‐old intrastriatal mesencephalic grafts surviving in a patient with Parkinson's disease. Mov. Disord. 25, 1091–1096. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106. Cooper O, Astradsson A, Hallett P, Robertson H, Mendez I, Isacson O (2009) Lack of functional relevance of isolated cell damage in transplants of Parkinson's disease patients. J. Neurol. 256(Suppl 3), 310–316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107. Barker RA, Barrett J, Mason SL, Bjorklund A (2013) Fetal dopaminergic transplantation trials and the future of neural grafting in Parkinson's disease. Lancet Neurol. 12, 84–91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108. Politis M, Wu K, Loane C, Quinn NP, Brooks DJ, Rehncrona S et al (2010) Serotonergic neurons mediate dyskinesia side effects in Parkinson's patients with neural transplants. Sci. Transl. Med. 2, 38ra46. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109. Politis M, Oertel WH, Wu K, Quinn NP, Pogarell O, Brooks DJ et al (2011) Graft‐induced dyskinesias in Parkinson's disease: high striatal serotonin/dopamine transporter ratio. Mov. Disord. 26, 1997–2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110. Doi D, Morizane A, Kikuchi T, Onoe H, Hayashi T, Kawasaki T et al (2012) Prolonged maturation culture favors a reduction in the tumorigenicity and the dopaminergic function of human ESC‐derived neural cells in a primate model of Parkinson's disease. Stem Cells 30, 935–945. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111. Sundberg M, Bogetofte H, Lawson T, Jansson J, Smith G, Astradsson A et al (2013) Improved cell therapy protocols for Parkinson's disease based on differentiation efficiency and safety of hESC‐, hiPSC‐, and non‐human primate iPSC‐derived dopaminergic neurons. Stem Cells 31, 1548–1562. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112. Pruszak J, Ludwig W, Blak A, Alavian K, Isacson O (2009) CD15, CD24, and CD29 define a surface biomarker code for neural lineage differentiation of stem cells. Stem Cells 27, 2928–2940. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113. Yuan SH, Martin J, Elia J, Flippin J, Paramban RI, Hefferan MP et al (2011) Cell‐surface marker signatures for the isolation of neural stem cells, glia and neurons derived from human pluripotent stem cells. PLoS ONE 6, e17540. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Cell Proliferation are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES