Skip to main content
. 2002 Feb 23;324(7335):459–464. doi: 10.1136/bmj.324.7335.459

Table 5.

Sensitivity and specificity of results when healthcare professionals determined whether patients are at high risk of coronary heart disease.* Values are numbers (percentage, 95% confidence interval)

Method used to calculate risk Sensitivity
Specificity
Practice nurses General practitioners Practice nurses General practitioners
Subjective risk estimate 55/83 (66, 56 to 76) 60/83 (72, 63 to 82) 70/97 (72, 63 to 81) 71/97 (73, 64 to 82)
Sheffield table 45/77 (58, 47 to 69) 48/75 (64, 53 to 75) 43/50 (86, 76 to 96) 50/56 (89, 81 to 97)
New Zealand table 50/80 (63, 52 to 73) 60/81 (74, 65 to 84) 48/68 (63, 52 to 73) 43/53 (81, 71 to 92)
European table 51/79 (65, 54 to 75) 49/80 (61, 51 to 72) 52/70 (74, 64 to 84) 50/69 (72, 62 to 83)
British program 58/73 (79, 70 to 89) 60/75 (80, 71 to 89) 23/23 (100) 20/24 (83, 68 to 98)
*

Compared with the reference standard of Framingham equation, with missing values replaced by population normal values. 

Reference standard for high risk is 10 year risk of coronary heart disease >30%. 

Variations in denominators between general practitioners and practice nurses for the same calculation tool reflect variations in number of calculations made.