Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Apr 24.
Published in final edited form as: Cell Syst. 2019 Apr 3;8(4):281–291.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.cels.2018.11.005

Table 2.

Scrublet-Predicted and Experimentally Expected Doublet Fractions

Dataset Scrublet outputs Experimental rate
Detected doublets (δ) Detectable doublet fraction (ϕD) Overall doublet rate (δ/ϕD) Overall doublet rate (ρ^) Rationale
Mouse-human (Figure 3) 5.9% 54% 10.9% 11.6% Using mouse versus human genomes
Demuxlet (Figure 4) 8.1% 55% 14.6% 12.2% Using human SNPs
PBMCs (Figure 5B) 1.8% 53% 3.5% 3% Nominal doublet rate
PBMCs (Figure 5C) 4.1% 61% 6.8% 6% Nominal doublet rate
Bone marrow (Figure 6) 3.6% 43% 8.3% 5%–10% inDrops observed droplet occupancy