Figure 2.
Behavioral results indicate that participants adopted different retrieval sets for the high and low control conditions. A, Recognition wasless accurate in the high versus low control condition. B, Response times were slower in high versus low control conditions, with hits (HIT) being faster than correct rejections (CR). C, Subsequent memory for lures presented during the scanned tests was better for items presented in the high versus low control condition. (In C, DN, PN, PO, and DO refer to participants identifying critical lures as “definitely new,” “probably new,” “probably old,” and “definitely old.”)