. 2008 Jul 25;30(5):1637–1651. doi: 10.1002/hbm.20630

Table III.

Extended system of face perception

Region‐of‐interest	Localizer	# of subjects (n = 16)	X	Y	Z
Right mSTS	Static	5	51 ± 14	−5 ± 8	−9 ± 6
Right mSTS	Dynamic	11	49 ± 12	−5 ± 10	−11 ± 7
Left mSTS	Static	3	−53 ± 14	−16 ± 8	−5 ± 6
Left mSTS	Dynamic	12	55 ± 15	−16 ± 8	−5 ± 6
Right AMG	Static	3	18 ± 5	−2 ± 2	−13 ± 5
Right AMG	Dynamic	7	18 ± 6	−4 ± 2	−11 ± 4
Left AMG	Static	0	18 ± 8	−3 ± 4	−11 ± 5
Left AMG	Dynamic	5	19 ± 7	−6 ± 4	−14 ± 5
Right IFG	Static	7	42 ± 11	19 ± 10	26 ± 12
Right IFG	Dynamic	15	46 ± 12	21 ± 11	22 ± 12
Left IFG	Static	6	−40 ± 12	20 ± 11	20 ± 11
Left IFG	Dynamic	12	−47 ± 12	17 ± 7	21 ± 9
preC	Static	7	0 ± 4	−59 ± 18	30 ± 11
preC	Dynamic	14	1 ± 4	−62 ± 16	30 ± 10
aPC	Static	9	2 ± 5	59 ± 15	7 ± 9
aPC	Dynamic	12	6 ± 4	54 ± 14	20 ± 12

Number of participants in whom the ROI was localized and average Talairach coordinates (Mean ± SD) are reported for both static and dynamic localizers. ROIs were localized using the contrast faces > objects with a statistical threshold of P < 0.05 (1‐tailed Bonferroni). In all cases, the dynamic localizer was more consistent in identifying face‐related ROIs. Average Talairach coordinates of the peak voxels show that static and dynamic localizers localized similarly positioned ROIs.