Skip to main content
. 2000 Dec 13;12(2):79–93. doi: 10.1002/1097-0193(200102)12:2<79::AID-HBM1005>3.0.CO;2-I

Table I.

SPM vs. CSM comparison for subject 1*

SPM CSM
P(corr.) t x,y,z(mm) P(corr.) t x,y,z(mm) dist(mm)
0.000 18.03 41.2 −33.8 0.0 0.000 17.77 42.6 −32.9 −2.4 2.8
0.000 13.68 −41.2 3.8 7.6 0.000 10.22 −40.4 3.8 3.8 3.9
0.000 13.50 56.2 11.2 −7.6 0.000 12.11 56.3 11.8 −8.3 0.9
0.000 13.06 −45.0 −45.0 −30.4 0.000 12.74 −44.5 −45.9 −28.8 1.9
0.000 7.89 18.8 −18.8 −26.6 0.000 9.94 18.6 −21.2 −25.5 2.7
0.001 7.05 30.0 45.0 11.4 0.000 7.87 31.7 42.2 11.1 3.3
0.001 6.73 −3.8 −67.5 3.8 0.000 7.57 −3.5 −68.7 3.9 1.2
0.002 6.61 48.8 −56.2 −30.4 0.000 7.53 47.4 −56.6 −29.5 1.7
0.002 6.59 −30.0 −67.5 −15.2 0.000 10.11 −30.6 −66.5 −15.0 1.1
0.014 5.88 −7.5 −18.8 −22.8 0.002 6.33 −6.9 −19.8 −24.0 1.7
0.018 5.79 −7.5 −37.5 7.6 0.001 6.40 −7.6 −39.1 6.9 1.7
0.031 5.58 −37.5 30.0 −7.6 0.009 5.73 −38.6 33.2 −8.8 3.7
0.040 5.48 30.0 −48.8 −7.6 0.007 5.82 30.8 −48.5 −7.3 0.9
*

CSM sensitivity at SPM maxima locations.