Skip to main content
Human Brain Mapping logoLink to Human Brain Mapping
. 1998 Dec 7;6(4):239–249. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0193(1998)6:4<239::AID-HBM4>3.0.CO;2-4

Effect of temporal autocorrelation due to physiological noise and stimulus paradigm on voxel‐level false‐positive rates in fMRI

Patrick L Purdon 1,, Robert M Weisskoff 1
PMCID: PMC6873371  PMID: 9704263

Abstract

Statistical mapping within a binary hypothesis testing framework is the most widely used analytical method in functional MRI of the brain. A common assumption in this kind of analysis is that the fMRI time series are independent and identically distributed in time, yet we know that fMRI data can have significant temporal correlation due to low‐frequency physiological fluctuation (Weisskoff et al. [1993]; Proc Soc Magn Reson Med 9:7; Biswal et al. [1995]: Mag Reson Med 34:537–541). Furthermore, since the signal‐to‐noise ratio will vary with imaging rate, we should expect that the degree of correlation will vary with imaging rate. In this paper, we investigate the effect of temporal correlation and experimental paradigm on false‐positive rates (type I error rates), using data synthesized through a simple autoregressive plus white‐noise model whose parameters were estimated from real data over a range of imaging rates. We demonstrate that actual false‐positive rates can be biased far above or below the assumed significance level α when temporal autocorrelation is ignored in a way that depends on both the degree of correlation as well as the paradigm frequency. Furthermore, we present a simple method, based on the noise model described above, for correcting such distortions, and relate this method to the extended general linear model of Worsley and Friston ([1995]: Neuroimage 2:173–181). Hum. Brain Mapping 6:239–249, 1998. © 1998 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Keywords: fMRI, statistical parametric mapping, noise modeling, colored noise, brain noise

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (148.4 KB).

References

  1. Aguirre GK, Zarahn E, D'Esposito M (1997): The Kolmogorov‐Smirnov (KS) statistic fails to control type I error in the analysis of BOLD fMRI data. Magn Reson Med (submitted). [DOI] [PubMed]
  2. Biswal B, Yetkin FZ, Haughton VM, Hyde JS (1995): Functional connectivity in the motor cortex of resting human brain using echo‐planar MRI. Magn Reson Med 34: 537–541. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Brockwell PJ, Davis RA (1991): Time Series: Theory and Methods, New York: Springer‐Verlag, pp 330–336. [Google Scholar]
  4. Bullmore E, Brammer M, Williams SCR, Rabe‐Hesketh S, Janot N, David A, Mellers J, Robert H, Sham P (1996): Statistical methods of estimation and inference for functional MR image analysis. MRM 35: 261–277. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Friston KJ, Jezzard P, Turner R (1994): Analysis of functional MRI time‐series. Hum Brain Mapp 1: 153–171. [Google Scholar]
  6. Friston KJ, Holmes AP, Poline JB, Grasby PJ, Williams SCR, Frackowiak RSJ, Turner R (1995a): Analysis of fMRI time‐series revisited. Neuroimage 2: 45–53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Friston KJ, Holmes AP, Worsley KJ, Poline JP, Frith CD, Frackowiak RSJ (1995b): Statistical parametric maps in functional imaging: A general linear approach. Hum Brain Mapp 2: 189–210. [Google Scholar]
  8. Lange N, Zeger S (1997): Non‐linear Fourier time series analysis for human brain mapping by functional MRI. J R Stat Soc [C] Appl Stat 46: 1–26. [Google Scholar]
  9. Locascio JJ, Jennings PJ, Moore CI, Corkin S (1997): Time series analysis in the time domain and resampling methods for studies of functional magnetic resonance brain imaging. Hum Brain Mapp 5: 168–193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Oppenheim AV, Schafer RW (1989): Discrete‐Time Signal Processing, NJ: Prentice‐Hall. [Google Scholar]
  11. Papoulis A (1991): Probability, Random Variables, and Stochastic Processes. New York: McGraw‐Hill, pp 401–404. [Google Scholar]
  12. Press WH, Teukolsky SA, Vettering WT, Flannery BP (1992): Numerical Recipes in C: The Art of Scientific Computing, New York: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
  13. Weisskoff RM, Baker J, Belliveau J, Davis TL, Kwong KK, Cohen MS, Rosen BR (1993): Power spectrum analysis of functionallyweighted MR data: What's in the Noise? Proc Soc Magn Reson Med 1: 7. [Google Scholar]
  14. Worsley KJ, Friston KJ (1995): Analysis of fMRI time‐series revisited—Again. Neuroimage 2: 173–181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Xiong J, Gao JH, Lancaster JL, Fox PT (1996): Assessment and optimization of functional MRI analyses. Hum Brain Mapp 4: 153–167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Zarahn E, Aguirre GK, D'Esposito M (1997): Empirical analyses of BOLD fMRI statistics: I. Spatially unsmoothed data collected under null‐hypothesis conditions. Neuroimage 5: 179–197. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Human Brain Mapping are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES