Skip to main content
Springer Nature - PMC COVID-19 Collection logoLink to Springer Nature - PMC COVID-19 Collection
. 1988;101(3):221–235. doi: 10.1007/BF01311003

Monoclonal antibodies to a virulent strain of transmissible gastroenteritis virus: comparison of reactivity with virulent and attenuated virus

Siao-Kun Wan Welch 1, Linda J Saif 1
PMCID: PMC7086875  PMID: 2845894

Summary

Twelve hybridomas secreting monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) against Miller virulent strain of transmissible gastroenteritis virus (TGEV) were generated and characterized. In a cell culture immunofluorescence (CCIF) assay, three MAbs directed against peplomer protein (E 2) had perinuclear fluorescence and four unclassified MAbs showed cell membrane fluorescence. Six of these seven MAbs neutralized both attenuated and virulent TGEV, and the seventh (an unclassified MAb) neutralized only the latter virus. Two MAbs able to bind the cell membrane of infected cells had low neutralizing antibody titers (8 to 72) but were able to distinguish between virulent and attenuated TGEV (9- to 72-fold differences in neutralizing titers). Two E 2-specific MAbs had higher neutralizing antibody titers (782 to 34,117) and showed 4- to 13-fold differences in titers against the attenuated and virulent TGEV strains. Five MAbs which were specific for nucleocapsid (N) protein had cytoplasmic, particulate fluorescence in CCIF, and did not neutralize TGEV. Comparison of CCIF antibody titers of MAbs to the virulent and attenuated strains of TGEV indicated that differences existed in titers of most E 2 and all N-specific MAbs, with titers consistently higher against virulent TGEV (homologous strain).

Hyperimmune antisera prepared in gnotobiotic pigs against the attenuated, virulent and a recent isolate of TGEV immunoprecipitated the 3 major structural proteins of both the attenuated and virulent TGEV strains. Relative mol. wt. differences in the E 1 and E 2 proteins between the two virus strains were revealed using either the hyperimmune pig sera or MAbs. In addition to the 48 K N protein, a 44 K protein was coimmunoprecipitated by the hyperimmune sera and MAbs, but mainly from lysates of attenuated TGEV.

Keywords: Neutralize Antibody Titer, Major Structural Protein, Recent Isolate, Transmissible Gastroenteritis Virus, Hyperimmune Seron

References

  • 1.Bohl EH, Gupta RKP, McCloskey LW, Saif LJ. Antibody responses in serum, colostrum and milk of swine after infection or vaccination with transmissible gastroenteritis virus. Infect Immun. 1972;6:289–301. doi: 10.1128/iai.6.3.289-301.1972. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Bonner WM, Laskey RA. A film detection method for tritium-labeled proteins and nucleic acids in polyacrylamide gel. Eur J Biochem. 1974;46:83–88. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1974.tb03599.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Delmas B, Gelfi J, Laude H. Antigenic structure of transmissible gastroenteritis virus. II. Domains in the peplomer glycoprotein. J Gen Virol. 1986;67:1405–1418. doi: 10.1099/0022-1317-67-7-1405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Furuuchi S, Shimizu Y, Kumagai T. Comparison of properties between virulent and attenuated strains of transmissible gastroenteritis virus. Natl Inst Anim Health Q. 1975;15:159–164. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Garwes DJ, Pocock DH. The polypeptide structure of transmissible gastroenteritis virus. J Gen Virol. 1975;29:25–34. doi: 10.1099/0022-1317-29-1-25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Garwes DJ, Lucas MH, Higgins DA, Pike BV, Cartwright SF. Antigenicity of structural components from porcine transmissible gastroenteritis virus. Vet Micro. 1978;3:179–190. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Hess RG, Bachmann PA. In vitro differentiation and pH sensitivity of field and cell culture-attenuated strains of transmissible gastroenteritis virus. Infect Immun. 1976;13:1642–1646. doi: 10.1128/iai.13.6.1642-1646.1976. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Hu S, Bruszewski J, Boone T, Souza L. Cloning and expression of the surface glycoprotein gp 195 of porcine transmissible gastroenteritis virus. In: Chanock RM, Lerner RA, editors. Modern approaches to vaccines. New York: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory; 1984. pp. 219–223. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Jimenez G, Correa I, Melgosa MP, Bullido MJ, Enjuanes L. Critical epitopes in transmissible gastroenteritis virus neutralization. J Virol. 1986;60:131–139. doi: 10.1128/jvi.60.1.131-139.1986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Kohler G, Milstein C. Continuous cultures of fused cells secreting antibody of predefined specificity. Nature. 1975;256:495–497. doi: 10.1038/256495a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Laemmli UK. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature. 1970;227:680–685. doi: 10.1038/227680a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Laude H, Chapsal JM, Gelfi J, Labiau S, Grosclause J. Antigenic structure of transmissible gastroenteritis virus. I. Properties of monoclonal antibodies directed against virion proteins. J Gen Virol. 1986;67:119–130. doi: 10.1099/0022-1317-67-1-119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Morilla A, Ristic M. Immunologic discrepancy between intestinal and cell culture viruses of transmissible gastroenteritis of swine. Am J Vet Res. 1973;34:1533–1538. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Morilla A, Klemm RC, Sprino P, Ristic M. Neutralization of a transmissible gastroenteritis virus of swine by colostral antibodies elicited by intestine and cell culture-propagated virus. Am J Vet Res. 1976;37:1011–1016. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Oi VT, Herzenberg LA. Immunoglobulin-producing hybrid cell lines. In: Mishell BB, Shiigi SM, editors. Selected methods in cellular immunology. San Francisco: Freeman; 1980. pp. 351–372. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Okaniwa A, Harada K, Park DK. Structure of swine transmissible gastroenteritis virus examined by negative staining. Natl Inst Animal Health Q. 1968;8:175–181. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Ouchterlony D, Nilsson LA. Immunodiffusion and immunoelectrophoresis. In: Weir DM, editor. Handbook of experimental immunology. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publ; 1978. pp. 19.1–19.44. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Saif LJ, Bohl EH. Transmissible gastroenteritis. In: Leman AD, Straw B, Glock RD, Mengeling WL, Penny RH, Scholl E, editors. Diseases of swine. Iowa: Iowa State University Press; 1986. pp. 255–274. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Saif LJ, Bohl EH, Kohler EM, Hughes JH. Immune electron microscopy of transmissible gastroenteritis virus and rotavirus (reovirus-like agent) of swine. Am J Vet Res. 1977;38:13–20. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Tamura GS, Dailey MO, Gallatin WM, McGrath MS, Weissman IL, Pillemer EA. Isolation of molecules recognized by monoclonal antibodies and antisera: the solid phase immunoisolation technique. Anal Biochem. 1984;136:458–464. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(84)90244-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Wesley RD, Woods RD. Identification of a 17,000 molecular weight antigenic polypeptide in transmissible gastroenteritis virus-infected cells. J Gen Virol. 1986;67:1419–1425. doi: 10.1099/0022-1317-67-7-1419. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Woods RD, Wesley RD, Kapke PA. Neutralization of porcine transmissible gastroenteritis virus by complement-dependent monoclonal antibodies. Am J Vet Res. 1988;49:300–304. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Archives of Virology are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES