Skip to main content
. 2011 Sep 7;2011(9):CD008012. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008012.pub3

Doering 2007.

Methods RCT design: 2‐arm parallel group trial
Total N randomised: Not stated
Length of follow‐up: 4 months
Analysis: Per‐protocol
Participants Location: USA
Number of study centres and setting: 2 urban medical centres
CAD diagnosis: Patients undergoing first‐time Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (CABG); time to randomization not specified
Depression diagnosis: Patients with Mini‐Mental State Examination (MMSE) score of >= 24 were interviewed with the Diagnostic Interview and Structured Hamilton (DISH); diagnosis of major depression during inpatient treatment or 2 to 4 weeks after hospital admission or minor depression at both interviews
Other entry criteria: <=75 years, English‐speaking, available for 6 months follow‐up
Exclusion criteria: Malignancies or autoimmune disorders
Treatment N: 7 (100% female, mean age: 58.6 (SD: 7.6))
Control N: 8 (100% female, mean age: 60.9 (SD: 9.4))
Comparability of groups: Treatment patients with a significantly higher rate of depression history
Interventions Treatment: Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (weekly 1‐hour sessions) by a trained nurse therapist including establishing therapeutic relationship, behavioral activation, active problem‐solving, identification of automatic thoughts, reframing automatic thoughts, learning self‐therapy and relapse prevention
Control: Usual care comprising usual medical and nursing follow‐up after CABG and an assessment by a psychiatrist who recommended individualised treatment options
Duration of treatment: 8 weeks
Outcomes Review outcomes: Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) score
Other outcomes: Postoperative illnesses measured by a Modified Health Review (MHR), Natural killer cell cytotoxicity (NK cytotoxicity), Interleukin (IL‐6), C‐reactive protein (CRP)
Funding Not stated
Notes Study investigated depressed post‐CABG women
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Comment: No details reported
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Comment: No details reported
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Comment: Outcome assessed by a blinded research assistant
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes High risk Quote: "Only those patients who completed all study measures were included in this report." (p. 19)
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk Comment: Outcomes reported as stated in the methods section
Comment: No protocol or design paper available
Other bias Unclear risk Comment: No efforts regarding nurse therapists protocol adherence reported
Comment: Usual care comprised psychiatrists' recommendations for individualised treatment options, but utilised treatments of control patients were not assessed