Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 1;11:4932. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-18723-y

Table 2.

Genes reaching new de novo enrichment significance.

Gene DNM All (denovo-db | SPARK-27K) CH model denovolyzeR Significance (union of two models) Reported significance
dnLGD dnMIS dnMIS30 dnLGD p-value dnMIS p-value dnMIS30 p-value dnALT p-value dnLGD p-value dnMIS p-value dnALT p-value FDR FWER Coe253 ASC102 DDD299
New FDR significance
UIMC1 0 (0|0) 6 (4|2) 0 (0|0) 1 1.67E−02 1 2.94E−02 1 5.00E−05 2.01E−04 dnMIS dnALT No No No
SMARCC2 4 (2|2) 2 (2|0) 0 (0|0) 6.53E−05 4.44E−01 1 8.20E−03 5.17E−05 3.76E−01 4.49E−03 dnLGD No Yes No
NRXN1 1 (1|0) 7 (5|2) 1 (1|0) 2.13E−01 4.70E−03 2.06E−01 2.30E−03 1.57E−01 1.54E−03 4.87E−04 dnALT No Yes No
HNRNPK 2 (2|0) 2 (1|1) 2 (1|1) 1.16E−03 3.89E−02 2.30E−04 5.00E−04 6.27E−03 9.96E−02 4.38E−03 dnALT No No Yes
GABRG2 1 (0|1) 4 (3|1) 3 (3|0) 2.41E−01 1.52E−01 1.29E−03 8.69E−02 1.22E−01 1.47E−03 4.16E−04 dnALT No No No
New FWER significance
ANK2 9 (6|3) 5 (5|0) 1 (1|0) 1.13E−05 9.97E−01 6.88E−01 6.08E−01 6.09E−09 3.03E−01 1.22E−04 dnLGD dnALT dnLGD Yes Yes No
TBR1 4 (3|1) 3 (2|1) 1 (0|1) 1.93E−07 9.30E−03 2.60E−02 6.81E−07 2.01E−06 6.88E−02 9.41E−05 dnLGD dnALT dnLGD Yes Yes No
PHF12 4 (3|1) 1 (1|0) 0 (0|0) 1.06E−07 3.02E−01 1 6.08E−05 4.00E−06 6.83E−01 9.15E−03 dnLGD dnALT dnLGD Yes Yes No
TCF7L2 4 (3|1) 5 (3|2) 3 (3|0) 7.36E−06 2.30E−03 3.70E−04 1.26E−06 1.56E−05 9.05E−04 3.47E−07 dnLGD dnALT dnALT Yes Yes Yes
SETD2 6 (5|1) 2 (2|0) 1 (1|0) 4.39E−06 8.43E−01 2.56E−01 3.59E−02 3.30E−07 6.63E−01 4.55E−03 dnLGD dnLGD Yes No Yes
CASZ1 6 (4|2) 2 (0|2) 1 (0|1) 8.43E−07 8.17E−01 2.17E−01 2.35E−02 1.16E−09 7.09E−01 5.10E−03 dnLGD dnLGD Yes No No
NSD2 5 (4|1) 1 (1|0) 1 (1|0) 4.57E−07 7.20E−01 1.35E−01 3.40E−03 1.19E−07 7.82E−01 6.60E−03 dnLGD dnLGD Yes No Yes

Five genes newly reached FDR significance and seven genes reached FWER significance in the de novo enrichment analysis, compared to Coe et al.25, using the same methods (CH model and denovolyzeR) with DNMs in 17,426 NDD trios combined from denovo-db (v1.5) and SPARK-27K. The FDR significance threshold qdnEnrich < 0.05 was corrected by the Benjamini–Hochberg method for genes in each method (18,946 genes in CH model and 19,618 genes in denovolyzeR); the FWER significance threshold pdnEnrich < 3.64E−07 was corrected by the Bonferroni method for 19,618 genes and seven tests (dnLGD, dnMIS, dnMIS30, and dnALT variants in CH model, and dnLGD, dnMIS, and dnALT variants in denovolyzeR). Coe253 indicates whether the gene is in the 253 genes reported significant (FDR 5%) in Coe et al.25; ASC102 indicates whether the gene is in the 102 genes reported as significant (FDR 10%) in Satterstrom et al.8; and DDD299 indicates whether the gene is in the 299 genes reported as significant in Kaplanis et al.31. Note different methods and significant threshold were applied in those three studies. See Supplementary Data 10 for underlying data.