Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 29;7(6):000589. doi: 10.1099/mgen.0.000589

Table 1.

Summary of the prevalence of global lineages represented by more than one sample in the Norfolk dataset compared with the public set of genomes from GISAID and COG-UK (accessed 28 August 2020)

Norfolk

UKa

Globalb

Lineage

Samples

Per cent

Samples

Per cent

Samples

Per cent

B

21

2.03

1021

2.59

1831

2.97

B.1

63

6.09

5918

14.99*

13 354

21.63*

B.1.1

464

44.83

15 654

39.65*

19 424

31.46*

B.1.1.1

11

1.06

3658

9.26*

3933

6.37*

B.1.1.10

6

0.58

295

0.75

324

0.52

B.1.1.15

35

3.38

45

0.11*

60

0.97*

B.1.1.3

19

1.84

100

0.25*

100

0.16*

B.1.1.7

2

0.19

157

0.40

173

0.28

B.1.105

7

0.68

90

0.23

90

0.15*

B.1.11

111

10.72

793

2.01*

825

1.34*

B.1.111

11

1.06

11

0.03*

18

0.03*

B.1.5

33

3.19

997

2.53

1996

3.23

B.1.5.5

67

6.47

73

0.18*

75

0.12*

B.1.75

84

8.12

152

0.38*

156

0.25*

B.1.88

6

0.58

39

0.1*

43

0.07*

B.2

51

4.93

1343

3.40

1792

2.90*

B.2.1

13

1.26

2004

5.08*

2153

3.49*

B.21

12

1.16

26

0.07*

27

0.04*

B.3

9

0.87

1000

2.53*

1118

1.81

a, In this column those values marked with an asterisk are significantly more/less prevalent in Norfolk samples than UK samples (P<0.05 Bonferroni corrected for multiple hypothesis testing).

†‡b, In this column those values marked with an asterisk are significantly more/less prevalent in Norfolk samples than in global samples (P<0.05 Bonferroni corrected for multiple hypothesis testing).