Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Mar 28.
Published in final edited form as: J Neurosci. 2011 Sep 28;31(39):13786–13795. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2111-11.2011

Table 1.

References, anatomical information, and scale-free goodness-of-fit tests for each region of interest (ROI), as well as the effect of behavioral condition (Rest vs. Task) on fMRI signal variance, power-law exponent and Hurst exponent (paired t-tests; measurements from individual subjects were used as repeated measures, N = 17). Color code: Inline graphic

Network ROI Anatomical location Talairach coordinates Goodness-of-fit
p-value		 Variance
Rest vs. Task		 Power-law
exponent
Rest vs. Task		 Hurst exponent
Rest vs. Task
Rest Task t-value P-value t-value P-value t-value P-value
Attention vIPS1 (L and R) ventral intraparietal sulcus −24, −69, 30 & 30, −80, 16 0.42 0.27 2.143 0.048 3.194 0.005 4.107 0.0008
R TPJ1, 2 R temporoparietal junction 49, −50, 28 0.37 0.95 1.663 0.116 1.718 0.105 2.63 0.018
R DLPFC2–4 R dorsolateral prefrontal cortex 43, 22, 34 0.45 0.53 1.319 0.206 2.494 0.024 2.014 0.06
pIPS1 (L and R) posterior intraparietal sulcus −25, −63, 47 & 23 −65 48 0.17 0.55 1.268 0.223 2.733 0.015 3.588 0.002
MT1 (L and R) middle temporal region −43, −70 −3 & 42 −68 −6 0.56 0.48 0.947 0.358 3.592 0.002 3.649 0.002
FEF1 (L and R) frontal eye field −26, −9, 48 & 32, −9, 48 0.43 0.87 2.445 0.026 2.816 0.012 3.110 0.007
Default AG5 (L and R) angular gyrus −51, −54, 30 & 45, −66, 27 0.21 0.51 3.22 0.005 2.947 0.01 3.363 0.004
SFG5 (L and R) superior frontal cortex −15, 33, 48 & 18, 27, 48 0.80 0.98 2.334 0.033 1.012 0.327 4.007 0.001
PCC5 posterior cingulate cortex −6, −45, 33 0.14 0.15 4.545 0.0003 2.033 0.059 2.531 0.02
MPF5 medial prefrontal cortex −6, 51, −9 0.65 0.54 1.423 0.174 2.296 0.035 3.047 0.008
FP5 frontopolar cortex −3, 45, 36 0.72 0.09 2.679 0.016 1.953 0.069 4.418 0.0004
Motor L SII6 L second somatosensory area −57, −27, 21 0.98 0.28 1.063 0.303 1.902 0.075 2.600 0.019
L motor6 L primary motor cortex −39, −27, 48 0.19 0.79 3.377 0.004 2.46 0.026 4.487 0.0004
Broca7 Broca's area −42, 13, 14 0.98 0.16 0.662 0.517 1.967 0.067 2.620 0.019
Non-Neocortical Thalamus6 (L and R) thalamus −15, −21, 6 & 9, −18, 9 0.84 0.51 1.358 0.193 3.221 0.005 1.327 0.2
R Cerebellum6 R Cerebellum 21, −54, −21 0.96 0.32 0.927 0.368 1.938 0.07 2.353 0.03
HF8 (L and R) hippocampal formation −21, −25, −14 & 23, −23, −14 0.90 0.44 2.159 0.046 2.075 0.05 2.731 0.015
Saliency R FI3 R frontoinsular cortex 36, 21, −6 0.40 0.84 3.349 0.004 2.596 0.02 3.179 0.006
dACC2 dorsal anterior cingulate cortex −1, 10, 46 0.40 0.44 1.866 0.08 1.048 0.31 2.661 0.017
Visual vRetino6 (L and R) ventral retinal region −15, −75, −9 & 15, −75, −9 0.09 0.34 2.902 0.01 2.814 0.01 2.599 0.019
dRetino6 (L and R) dorsal retinal region −6, −75, 9 & 9, −75, 12 0.33 0.19 2.414 0.028 3.243 0.005 2.694 0.016
Individual-defined LMC9 L primary motor cortex 4.714 0.0002 2.166 0.046 4.053 0.0009
RMC9 R primary motor cortex 3.303 0.004 3.241 0.005 2.849 0.012

References:

1

He, B.J., et al. Breakdown of functional connectivity in frontoparietal networks underlies behavioral deficits in spatial neglect. Neuron 53, 905–918 (2007).

2

Dosenbach, N.U., et al. A core system for the implementation of task sets. Neuron 50, 799–812 (2006).

3

Seeley, W.W., et al. Dissociable intrinsic connectivity networks for salience processing and executive control. J Neurosci 27, 2349–2356 (2007).

4

Vincent, J.L., Kahn, I., Snyder, A.Z., Raichle, M.E. & Buckner, R.L. Evidence for a frontoparietal control system revealed by intrinsic functional connectivity. J Neurophysiol 100, 3328–3342 (2008).

5

Shulman, G.L., et al. Common blood flow changes across visual tasks: II. Decreases in cerebral cortex. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 9, 648–663 (1997).

6

He, B.J., et al. Breakdown of functional connectivity in frontoparietal networks underlies behavioral deficits in spatial neglect. Neuron 53, 905–918 (unpublished data) (2007).

7

Embick, D. & Poeppel, D. Mapping Syntax Using Imaging: Prospects and Problems for the Study of Neurolinguistic Computation. in Encyclopedia of language and linguistics (ed. K. Brown) 484–486 (Elsevier, Oxford (UK), 2006).

8

Vincent, J.L., et al. Coherent Spontaneous Activity Identifies a Hippocampal–Parietal Mnemonic Network. J Neurophysiol (2006).

9

Fox, M.D., Snyder, A.Z., Vincent, J.L. & Raichle, M.E. Intrinsic fluctuations within cortical systems account for intertrial variability in human behavior. Neuron 56, 171–184 (2007).