Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Sep 27.
Published in final edited form as: J Neurosci. 2013 Mar 27;33(13):5553–5563. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4409-12.2013

Table 1. Demographic information of all samples.

Mean and standard deviation (in parenthesis) are provided, span, if helpful

Derivation sample Validation sample
Sample characteristic ADNI NC ADNI AD BAC NC UCSF AD
A. Demographics
N subjects 39 50 72 19
Age at MRI, y 78.0 (6.4), 62 – 94 76.5 (7.4), 59 – 88 74.9 (5.7), 63 – 88 67.8 (9.7)#, 58 – 89
N women 17 (44%) 20 (40%) 48 (67%) 9 (47%)
Education, y 15.8 (2.8), 9 – 20 14.6 (3.1), 6 – 20 17.0 (1.9), 12 – 20 16.4(3.2), 9 – 22
B. Measurements
Δtime (MRI – FDG), y 0.1 (0.1) 0.1 (0.1) 0.2 (0.4) 0.4 (0.5)
Δtime (FDG – Aβ) Florbetapir, y: 3.1 (2.1)
CSF Aβ, d: 23.2 (35.6)
n.a. PIB, d: 0.0 (0.0) n.a.
Δtime (NTS – MRI), y 0.1 (0.1) 0.1 (0.0) 0.3 (0.2) 0.3 (0.4)
C. Biomarkers
N of Aβ-negative (−) or
Aβ-positive (+)
29 Florbetapir-,
10 CSF Aβ-
n.a. 47 PIB−,
25 PIB+
n.a.
APOE ε4 carrier 6 (15%) 36 (72%) 22 (31%) 10 (53%), missing: 3
D. Clinical cognitive status
MMSE 29.2 (1.2) 23.4 (2.2)* 28.8 (1.4) 20.3 (6.6)#
CDR (if available) 0/0.5/1/3 39/0/0 0/16/34 n.a. 1/5/10/1, missing: 2

Selected abbreviations: N - number, y - year, d - day, NTS - Neuropsychological Test Session, Δ - Difference, MMSE - Mini Mental Status Examination, CDR - Clinical Rating Scale, n.a. - not available

*

p < 0.05,

p < 0.1 comparison between ADNI NC and ADNI AD,

#

p < 0.05, comparison between BAC NC and UCSF AD